Should repetitive inane posters be removed?

It is totally irrelevant whether AC is a real ,very stupid person or a bot being manipulated from a fake news factory in the Ukraine. Nobody cares.

Actually, I'm not sure AC is a real person. I would find it really hard to write like that. Is it the manifestation of an AI experiment? It's just so off kilter.

Anyway, as long as it's not sucking up our bank details I say, "ignore". When I see that poster's ID I just scroll through to the next one.

Someone has to Anniebach - perhaps the LP will get the message in the end!!

Ps it's not a crime

Jalima so i am guilty of one crime ?

Ah! No I'm not. This is Gransnet.

I am amazed this ridiculous thread hasn't died a death.

As I have been told I write posts which make no sense ,inane? Been told to stop repeating facts , repetitive?
Definitely not Anniebach!!

Keep right on

Criticising one party leader , annoying ?
Others do that too, but not Jezza

Terribull

". Good God there's a lot of vitriol, bile and nastiness on the internet these days, but the "repetitive" poster doesn't stray into that territory from what I've seen."
---

I agree.

Vitriol, Bile and Nastiness are more of a reason to
' remove' a poster over that of somebody boring the life out of somebody.

"What is inane/annoying/repetitive to one person is not to another" POGS I do agree, many of us have our particular interests and what could be deemed by some as idiosyncratic points of view/beefs. It's way too high handed to ban contributors on that basis. Certain topics, are almost certain to attract the usual posters again and again. Yes I think, it's somewhat imperious to suggest that, should a poster reiterate the same contrary opinions, albeit in a somewhat trite/tongue in cheek manner they should be banned. Good God there's a lot of vitriol, bile and nastiness on the internet these days, but the "repetitive" poster doesn't stray into that territory from what I've seen.

As I have been told I write posts which make no sense ,inane? Been told to stop repeating facts , repetitive?
Criticising one party leader , annoying ?

Seems I am at the front of the queue ?

It's a case of "Here we go again, a predictable post in a predictable style" <yawn> Best to skip over them, given they don't add to the discussion.

The poster in question has been careful not to break the T&Cs but I feel certain s/he knows exactly what s/he's doing. They are even ensuring the grammar and punctuation of their posts is stylised.

I agree MamaCaz ignoring is the best course of action.

"Stop talking about other GNrs behind their backs."
----

That raises the question when does the accuser /accusers of another poster being ' a troll' become / be viewed as ' a troll' themselves?

What is inane / annoying / repetitive to one person is not to another. As the saying goes ' To see ourselves as others see us'.

It would therefore be a rocky road to ' remove.' a Gransnet user just because we think they are inane/repetative/annoying as that is in the eye of the beholder.

The posts in question just come over as immature attention seeking. Ignoring them is probably the best action.

Stop talking about other GNrs behind their backs.
You are right Gonegirl

andy are you an inane male poster?

I think i'll risk the methane and get some of those crunchy onion thingys. (Thingies?)
They do sound delish, MissA,and may keep the vampires at bay (or is that crunchy garlic?)

It can be a bit daunting at first, especially if you are male.
Who can tell anja, who can tell?
Although ….. yes, perhaps you're right
No woman could be --that inane-

do you mean to say that Boris is on here?

Another person who really should be banned from GN

lovely to see you ,love this thread greatly

such fun

Oh you must know what I mean. Discussing posters, and what they have said, on other threads.

I am slightly impressed that the "lovely ladies/ dearies" posts seem to have gone and recent posts are marginally more coherent. What's wrong with saying so?
Don't understand how "talking behind the backs of posters" is possible on an open forum (unless pm's are whizzing to and fro!)

I’d be tempted to say ‘good riddance’ and answer in kind but one doesn’t like to lower the tone any further.

Agree with Gonegirl

Just looked at thread after posting at the start
Talking about another GNer whether upfront or behind their back is not what GN is about