Gransnet forums

Site stuff

Temporary Mumsnet logo -not at all funny!

(232 Posts)
grannydarkhair Sat 06-May-23 08:24:20

Don’t know if many of you will have looked at Mumsnet today. They’ve changed their logo because of the coronation. I’m anything but a Royalist but think it’s extremely juvenile and disrespectful. Several threads have been started about it, the majority feel as I do.

Galaxy Sun 07-May-23 08:29:25

To dent some of the power. To question authority.
Are you asking why satire is important? There are endless explanations of its role.

NotSpaghetti Sun 07-May-23 08:27:07

Thanks BlueBalou
I think it's a poor response @gransnet

Sago Sun 07-May-23 08:27:00

It looks like the work of a 13 year old.
Pathetic.

fancythat Sun 07-May-23 08:26:03

Galaxy

It wasnt disgusting at all. It is very important to make fun of the powerful and has been throughout history.

Why is it important to make fun of the powerful?

Ailidh Sun 07-May-23 08:17:33

BlueBalou

*Hi everyone - we’re sorry that the logo has upset everyone. We honestly didn’t think beforehand how it might go down as it was intended as bit of fun - but we take your point. In a world where people are being arrested for being antimonarchist, we think it’s important as a society that we can freely make fun of the rich and powerful but clearly we misjudged the mood and it was poorly executed. We've now taken it down*

MN’s response was disgusting. Apparently making fun of the rich and powerful is ok now.
🤬

I agree.

I also thought it smug and disingenuous, as though thy thought they were striking some important bid for freedom.

Galaxy Sun 07-May-23 08:16:02

It wasnt disgusting at all. It is very important to make fun of the powerful and has been throughout history.

BlueBalou Sun 07-May-23 08:13:47

Hi everyone - we’re sorry that the logo has upset everyone. We honestly didn’t think beforehand how it might go down as it was intended as bit of fun - but we take your point. In a world where people are being arrested for being antimonarchist, we think it’s important as a society that we can freely make fun of the rich and powerful but clearly we misjudged the mood and it was poorly executed. We've now taken it down

MN’s response was disgusting. Apparently making fun of the rich and powerful is ok now.
🤬

NotSpaghetti Sun 07-May-23 08:13:07

I hadn't seen this.
@gransnet - why did you do it?

Just curious.

bikergran Sun 07-May-23 08:09:10

Louella12 I can sympathise with you, about having the "pinned operation"

bikergran Sun 07-May-23 08:05:41

Body shaming ! My brother had to have his ears pinned back at a teenage age, he was tormented so much. The procedure was so painful he did not want to have the other one done, but of course had to. It's pathetic that a so called adolescent site can mock a simple thing like ears. They must all be "Perfectly formed" on lala mumsnet.

Calendargirl Sun 07-May-23 07:37:40

heath480

What a fuss about nothing!!MN took the logo down!!

It should never have been put up in the first place though.

VioletSky Sun 07-May-23 02:03:43

Wish my son would get home from the celebrations, I want to go to bed!

heath480 Sun 07-May-23 01:56:22

What a fuss about nothing!!MN took the logo down!!

VioletSky Sun 07-May-23 01:18:31

Tidnock

^1 out of 10^

But you can't resist checking! grin

I'm just watching Greenland and drinking mint tea

You are also checking person on gransnet I've never spoken too before

How's your evening going?

Tidnock Sun 07-May-23 01:15:15

1 out of 10

But you can't resist checking! grin

Dickens Sun 07-May-23 01:08:48

Witzend

In very poor taste, not to mention very puerile.
Many of the posters on the MN thread would seem to agree.

But one poster did ask whether MNers would prefer something ‘servile’ instead. So I suppose it’s impossible to explain to anyone like that, that even an ardent republican could find it in very poor taste.

I'm a Republican (tho' not an ardent one), and I found it in poor taste.

Not only that - it seems it's OK because Charles is a man - fair game... would a similar feature on a female be caricatured in the same way I wonder, and accepted as 'fun' by MNs?

It's the sort of jokey thing my son would have drawn on one of his exercise books. At school, when he was about 15.

VioletSky Sun 07-May-23 01:08:15

1 out of 10

Tidnock Sun 07-May-23 01:02:59

It wasn't meant to be witty or intellectual, just observant. Why so aggressive when I was agreeing with you! wink

VioletSky Sun 07-May-23 00:34:14

Tidnock

^Nasty, evil, bullying Violetsky^

Well you said it, no one else.

I'll score that 2 out of 10

Not very witty or intellectual as comebacks go

Tidnock Sun 07-May-23 00:22:15

Nasty, evil, bullying Violetsky

Well you said it, no one else.

VioletSky Sat 06-May-23 23:39:12

I just laughed and felt guilty for it

Then everybody lost their minds

Nasty, evil, bullying Violetsky

But we know why don't we wink

VioletSky Sat 06-May-23 23:35:55

I have no idea, I didn't actually do it did I?

Mumsnet did

Callistemon21 Sat 06-May-23 23:09:30

VioletSky

Tangents, we have them

People's ears and noses or whatever are not abnormalities either!

So why poke fun at them?

QED

VioletSky Sat 06-May-23 23:08:13

Tangents, we have them

People's ears and noses or whatever are not abnormalities either!

Callistemon21 Sat 06-May-23 23:05:03

Smileless2012

I don't remember anything like that on GN either Callistemon.

And who ever said that skin colour is a physical abnormality?
Even suggesting that is sinking to an extraordinarily low level.

Red hair isn't either but having red hair certainly made my DD toughen up against the bullies.