Gransnet forums

Site stuff

Does GN have a programme that puts a value on different post categories?

(14 Posts)
DaisyAnneReturns Sun 10-Sept-23 10:04:38

You, well I, would expect posts to be in time order, on "Active". The simply are not.

Have GN made an editorial decision about what the want Grannies to read about?

Mollygo Sun 10-Sept-23 10:10:39

Active seems to reflect a thread with the latest post. For example the latest post was Trans teacher- but not for long.
The problem is that we are all posting on different threads at the same time so the most recent thread could change within seconds.
Whether or not GN have a hierarchy of posts to be shown -who knows. Perhaps they’ll tell us.

DaisyAnneReturns Sun 10-Sept-23 10:18:22

I have posted three times this morning. At the time of writing two, one posted at 9.50, one at 9.51 have not appeared at all. This thread appeared immediately. The first two, not surprisingly, have not been replied to so would not/should not have move on the time line. If left much longer they may go live but never show on the "Active" timeline.

maddyone Sun 10-Sept-23 10:27:40

I think you could be right Daisy.

DaisyAnneReturns Sun 10-Sept-23 10:33:02

Looking down the current Active list, this seem to be happening to both 'News and Politics' and 'Games'.

That, if it is true, is an editorial decision.

fancythat Sun 10-Sept-23 10:48:23

I use Last Day instead of Active.
Last Day are in proper time order.
Not even sure what Active is, or how it is operated.

JackyB Sun 10-Sept-23 11:15:36

This has often been remarked upon. People have contributed to a thread then checked the "Active" list, but their thread was not at the top, however, other threads where the latest post was older, had made it to the top of the list. It all seems quite arbitrary until, as DaisyAnn asks, you start to notice which threads are given priority and which ones drop unaccountably off the list. GNHQ of course denies this.

GNHQ couldn't understand the problem when it was first pointed out, then when it was spelt out to them so that someone there finally understood, we were told that they were "working on it".

Fleurpepper Sun 10-Sept-23 11:15:38

DaisyAnneReturns

You, well I, would expect posts to be in time order, on "Active". The simply are not.

Have GN made an editorial decision about what the want Grannies to read about?

Yes, this has been clear to me for a very long time.

Calendargirl Sun 10-Sept-23 11:26:41

Updated posts about Coronation Street on the TV Forum rarely make it to the top!

DaisyAnneReturns Sun 10-Sept-23 11:30:53

JackyB

This has often been remarked upon. People have contributed to a thread then checked the "Active" list, but their thread was not at the top, however, other threads where the latest post was older, had made it to the top of the list. It all seems quite arbitrary until, as DaisyAnn asks, you start to notice which threads are given priority and which ones drop unaccountably off the list. GNHQ of course denies this.

GNHQ couldn't understand the problem when it was first pointed out, then when it was spelt out to them so that someone there finally understood, we were told that they were "working on it".

It could just be a glitch, of course. I will try last day - thank you fancythat.

That means I won't miss posts but those who still use "Active" will.

Farmor15 Sun 10-Sept-23 13:45:33

As fancythat says, use 'last day' or 'last hour' to see posts in the order they were posted. 'Active' seems to be the default but simply use dropdown menu to find other options.

JackyB Sun 10-Sept-23 15:56:17

I've now had a look at "Last day". What does the "bump and reset" button do? Does it bump it up to the top of everybody's list?

Oreo Sun 10-Sept-23 16:07:10

It could be that a thread needs different names to send it to the top, not just one or two posters who make several comments.
What does it matter anyway.🤷‍♀️

Galaxy Sun 10-Sept-23 19:38:16

I think you are really overestimating GN/MN tech knowledge.