I am planning to take a week out from my holiday with my family in New Zealand to go snorkeling on Fiji. I have had a quote from an agent for one resort,which would cost about £1,500 for a week. The reviews on Trip Advisor and Lonely Planet say this resort is very busy with hordes of 'rowdy children'. I have had another island recommended on a snorkeling forum which sounds like paradise. Only eight villas, they meet you at Nadi airport and take you in their own fast boat to the island, three meals a day, and a luxury villa. I would have to arrange my own flights from Auckland to Nadi, the main airpor for Fiji. The total cost would be about £2,500. The coral is wonderful from all the islands of Fiji, so it is just the accommodation and tranquility that make the difference.
I am 72 and I have enough in my travel fund. I was disappointed last year in Phuket when the coral had all been destroyed. I spend very little for the rest of the year.
I don't need to save for my future as my pension income is guaranteed and I have no mortgage and no debts.
So why do I feel it would be wrong to go for the more expensive option?
Belfast another appalling attack, we need to ask what is driving this.
Soops kitchen, a place of reflection, refuge and at times revelry.








