At the risk of being shot down, I saw him on the programme "Money for Nothing" a few times.
He would 'restore' an old item, then ruin it by painting/ gilding one leg, say, of a chair, thereby ruining it.
When there happened to be close ups, the finish was bad.
How he can suggest he is a restorer, when appearing with those who clearly are, is beyond me?
I think I have seen him say he has been a builder and a philosophy student.
Jack of all trades, Master of none.
I don't like him, can you tell?