I seem to remember Diana moved into Clarence House just before the wedding so they did not leave from the same residence. I think she was in Buck House before that.
Thinking of selling due to heat
I really enjoyed series 1-3 partly due to the historical aspect I think. From the trailers I've seen, series 4 is set in the 80's- so the Thatcher Years, Charles and Diana etc.
This is recent memory and I wonder how it'll be received by those whom it portrays, and their relatives, who are still with us...maybe they'll rise above it with no comment.
However some 'friends' of the Royals are already in the press criticising the portrayal of C and D, and Carol Thatcher has dismissed as nonsense the way her mother has been shown as favouring her brother (but even when he got lost in the Sahara I seem to remember Mrs T defending him so maybe the producers aren't too far away from the reality!).
I seem to remember Diana moved into Clarence House just before the wedding so they did not leave from the same residence. I think she was in Buck House before that.
Sparklefizz
Jane10 I thought Diana moved into Clarence House to live with the Queen mother before her marriage and not Buck House as shown.
I'm pretty sure you're right! There are loads of mistakes in the episodes I've watched.
But are they mistakes ? Are the makers claiming accuracy do you think or just creating a drama loosely based on what happened ?
Trouble with that is that people will take it for gospel along with all the other inaccuracies. History is what it is, you can't make it up just to make a good story.
I think Shakespeare would disagree
This is a long story condensed into short episodes. They can’t include every single historical detail. It’s broadly based on events. We don’t know all the ins and outs so we can’t pretend to say this or that couldn’t have happened. I don’t think people are stupid enough not to realise this. I read an article about the costume department and how they dressed the different characters. It was fascinating how they tried to be accurate.
I’m enjoying watching the Ctown I’ve nearly completed 1-3 series. Simultaneously I’m reading Lady in waiting the authetwho was a dear friend of princess Margaret. I love hearing her stories of how the aristocrats lived in her youth. Her husband bought the island of mustique and when he died he left all his wealth to the Nan who cared for his elephant and nothing to his wife. She was on the This morning programme telling viewers her husband took her to a brothel on her honeymoon. She was also interviewed by Graham Norton recently and she was very interesting she’s becoming a famous author in her own right sorry I can’t remember her name at the moment
Sorry too for the typos 
Anne Glenconner is the name of the author of the book Elizabeth1 It sounds right up my street so one to add to my xmas wish list, thanks for the heads up. 
Craig Brown's book 'Ma'am Darling' about Princess Margaret is literally brilliant.
It's written in a totally unique (to him) way. He's written a similar one about the Beatles.
Brown uses PM / the Beatles as a sort of starting point and writes around it.
He is a genius. My all time favourite writer.
(Haven't seen this series of The Crown yet, or indeed read all of this thread. I see it (the Crown) isn't getting the best of reviews.)
I enjoyed a series on BBC2 earlier this year Princess Margaret: The Rebel Royal. Mention of Lady Glenconner reminded me of it. She and another elderly lady, whose name escapes me, feature a lot in it.
They were close friends of Princess Margaret. The Glenconners hosted holidays and parties for her on their island of Mustique.
Lots of chat about Margaret’s relationships within the RF and also with Peter Townsend, her husband Tony Armstrong and her relationship with Roddy Llewelyn who was 30 years her junior.
Interesting photos and film and news footage. Well worth a watch. It was sad to see how she bowed to pressure from the Royal family and the Church who were so disapproving of her relationship of Townsend because he was divorced. Now divorce is common within the RF.
PS if anyone is interested it should be on BBC iPlayer
Very insensitive showing a member of my family tree being blown up.
Yet a trigger warning given for bulimia!
Having now watched six episodes of the new season, I'm taking the whole thing with a massive dose of salt. I found the depiction of Diana throwing up in the loo to be highly distasteful, even though that might be true to history.
I am beginning to feel sorry for the lot of them if it is true that they put the survival of the Crown before the happiness and well-being of family members.
It is such a unique and narrow sense of duty and I wonder if it was worth the sacrifice.
I have watched up to the fifth episode now. Is it my imagination or is Mrs T’s hair getting bigger and higher? She is beginning to look like Marge Simpson.
Yess! Tweedle I thought that when I was watching an episode yesterday.
that was Lady Colin Tennant... ! The book is amazing - it has been criticised for its snobby attitude but I think it was more a case of the upbringing and taking things for granted in those times.
The Sunday Times had a “true or false” article. ( Sorry if someone has already mentioned this), which was interesting.Cant remember who wrote it but they were of the opinion that it was rather one sided in the Diana v Charles story. Expect you can guess who came off best!
On come on! Shakespeare never ever trashed the reigning House/Monarch. It was Tudor propaganda trashing the Plantagenets, certainly not the then current Queen or her family. Shakespeare didn't have a worldwide audience either, so hardly comparable.
Who is trashing the reigning House/Monarch?
Jaberwok
Trouble with that is that people will take it for gospel along with all the other inaccuracies. History is what it is, you can't make it up just to make a good story.
Totally agree. People who live outside the UK and with little knowledge of the UK will take is even more as gospel, and not have the historical/cultural background to balance truth and fiction. Very damaging I feel.
Maggie Thatcher's hair has a starring role of its own.
Can't take my eyes off it.
Netflix, by their inaccuracies. No wonder Prince Harry is insisting that he series stops before his relationship with Meghan. What a hypocrite!!
Yes Maggie's hair is massive. Something strange about the teeth too.
I enjoyed Lady Glenconner's book very much but actually positively disliked Craig Brown's book on Princess Margaret. It just felt like a rehash of Daily Mail articles. Quite unpleasant reading.
To my mind the best writer about the Royal family is Hugo Vickers. His book on Queen Mary was so well written. I wish he would write one about the Queen or maybe Prince Philip. A lot to find out there I suspect.
I've watched all episodes now - the costumes, settings etc. are so well done and must have cost a fortune, and as a soap, drama or whatever it is well done, but the scriptwriter must be anti monarchy given the bias toward Diana. I read an article in the Times at the weekend, and it appears there were so many innacuracies and large swathes of fiction, none of it putting the RF in a good light. It would surely make uncomfortble watching for the whole family.
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join the discussion, watch threads and lots more.
Register now »Already registered? Log in with:
Gransnet »Get our top conversations, latest advice, fantastic competitions, and more, straight to your inbox. Sign up to our daily newsletter here.