Gransnet forums

TV, radio, film, Arts

Why are we subjected to such rubbish

(113 Posts)
Germanshepherdsmum Thu 02-Dec-21 17:52:37

Maybe the viewing figures are good? Nowt so queer as folk.

mrswoo Thu 02-Dec-21 17:52:16

It's as if programme makers have totally run out of original or creative ideas. As DH says when confronted with yet another "reality" programme "you can almost hear that barrel being scraped" Although, reading the heading of your post sashabel, I thought you were referring to Mrs Brown's Boys - possibly the worst programme ever. IMOgrin

Sashabel Thu 02-Dec-21 17:28:25

I know it's cheap to make as I used to work for a TV station. It's just such a lazy way to fill air time. I imagine the production departments sitting around a table trying to think of new programming ideas and one smart 20 year old with a media studies degree coming up with these scenarios. Just because we have many stations to choose from doesn't necessarily mean the quality of programming has to go completely down the drain.

lemsip Thu 02-Dec-21 17:23:44

money! they are paid a fees, hotels and other expenses for all tv appearance because they are 'shows' for entertainment....that is the bottom line. there are ads to appear on various shows and not easy to get on them, there is a selection process whatever the 'show'!

Peasblossom Thu 02-Dec-21 15:08:41

H an, of course, everybody’s 15 minutes of fame.

Actually it’s quite fascinating to see yourself on tv.
(Says the woman seen laughing in the background of Antiques Riadshow??)

Peasblossom Thu 02-Dec-21 15:06:49

It’s cheap to make.

Inevitable if people want non-stop tv, I’m afraid.
Lots of air time at minimum cost.

That’s it really. ?

Sashabel Thu 02-Dec-21 14:57:59

If you read my post properly, Peasblossom, you will see that I don't subject myself to this tacky TV. What I am getting at is the amount of prime time TV scheduling is given over to it.

lovebeigecardigans1955 Thu 02-Dec-21 14:56:27

I wonder if some people want to be famous for 15 minutes and they don't care how, but yes it is baffling. If I lived in a dirty, cluttered house I wouldn't want it to be shown to millions of viewers as I'd be embarrassed.

OTOH, if someone suffers from some rare, dread disease or condition perhaps it can be helpful or informative to see that they can be helped with medical intervention in such programmes as Your Life in Their Hands, etc. Also, perhaps it can be demonstrated that the person with the condition may get some understanding from those of us who are lucky enough to enjoy good health.

Grandma70s Thu 02-Dec-21 14:47:32

Josianne

Also, why would you be filmed in the gp's consulting room?

That one really is baffling. People describing their dodgy bowel movements on national television,

I presume you are referring to GPs Behind Closed Doirs.

Josianne Thu 02-Dec-21 14:41:52

Also, why would you be filmed in the gp's consulting room?

Peasblossom Thu 02-Dec-21 14:41:32

Well, you’re not subjected to it. You can choose ?

Germanshepherdsmum Thu 02-Dec-21 14:38:28

I expect they’re paid to do it.

Sashabel Thu 02-Dec-21 14:16:33

Why would you allow the cameras into your disorganised, junk filled house and then let the likes of Stacey Solomon in to re-organise it?
Why would you let a team of cleaners in to transform your filthy living conditions into something more bearable and feel it is OK to share the experience on national television?
What goes through the minds of people who want to share the fact that they are in debt because they only buy designer stuff and eat take-aways 5 nights a week so are happy let two minor celebrities into their home to explain how to save money by doing more home cooking and shopping for cheaper alternatives?
Add all the above to the ridiculous number of cookery programmes we have to endure and I am increasingly turning to the "off" button on my remote.
This is just TV producers being lazy and unimaginative