Gransnet forums

News & politics

CAREN Act To Stop Racially Motivated Police Calls Proposed By California Lawmaker

(241 Posts)
GagaJo Fri 10-Jul-20 00:56:56

www.ladbible.com/news/weird-caren-act-to-stop-racially-motivated-911-calls-proposed-20200709?fbclid=IwAR0skM_QqKY5tjb45I0e6rhJ-v5qhGOFDzXwADi0FLtbS6l6lpUoFbRdJMQ

A new law proposed by a lawmaker in California is aimed at stopping people from making racially motivated calls to the police.

It's been proposed by San Francisco Supervisor Shamann Walton, and is called the 'CAREN' act, which stands for Caution Against Racially Exploitative Non-Emergencies.

Recently there has been a large uptick in incidents during which white women call the police to make reports against people of colour who they claim have made them feel uncomfortable while they're going about their daily business.

These people have become known colloquially as 'Karens'.

Calls to police can put the subject of those frivolous 911 contacts in danger of arrest for a crime they haven't committed, or an interaction with the police that could otherwise have been avoided.

Just recently, Amy Cooper called the police on a man who was birdwatching in a New York park because he'd asked her if she could put her dog onto a leash.

Then, closer to where the law is being proposed, Jennifer Schulte called the police when she saw two black men having a barbecue in a park.

A woman also threatened to call the cops on a man for stenciling 'Black Lives Matter' in chalk on his own house.

This new law aims to punish those who think they can use the police to intimidate people of colour who have done nothing wrong.

Walton argues that the proposed measures 'are part of a larger nationwide movement to address racial biases and implement consequences for weaponizing emergency resources with racist intentions'.

It's similar to a bill put forward by California State Assembly member Rob Bonta that calls for people who use law enforcement in a way that is biased towards people for their race, class, appearance, or religion.

Speaking about that piece of legislation, Bonta said: "This bill could protect millions of Californians from becoming targets of hate and prevent the weaponization of our law enforcement against communities of colour."

Let's hope that it makes a difference.

MawB Fri 10-Jul-20 11:39:06

rosecarmel

I don't get what Illte is asking, can someone explain?

“Two nations, divided by a common language” hmm ?

Seems clear enough to me.

MawB Fri 10-Jul-20 11:40:35

Riverwalk

In the UK these pejorative connotations with names and 'witty' alliterations are coined and perpetuated by middle class comedians/journalists, e.g. Essex girls, Croydon facelift, Scousebrow, pram face, etc., and are directly aimed at working class women.

Insidious.

Well said Riverwalk and as such we should not be perpetuating these cheap jibes.

Illte Fri 10-Jul-20 12:00:37

Oh well, I'm dumb.

I still dont understand.

Callistemon Fri 10-Jul-20 12:39:12

MawB

Riverwalk I appreciate that (I hope) you are not spreading this awful thing about people called Karen.
I have only become aware of it in the last couple of weeks and am feeling totally victimised and persecuted.
I think it is cruel and wrong in every way.

I am astonished that a name is being villified in this way. I know some lovely Karens and to use a female name in this derogatory fashion is appalling.

It's an important issue, obviously, although not one I was aware of but they lose credibility when they do something like this, misusing and disparaging a whole swathe of women.

Callistemon Fri 10-Jul-20 12:44:15

Like Sharon and Tracy, demeaning to anyone of that name but in this case it is far worse, it's vilification of thousands upon thousands of decent, kind women.

I know at least two Tracys as well, both highly educated women and we have a Sharon in the family who was so upset by the connotations that she changed her name.

GagaJo Fri 10-Jul-20 12:45:21

I think there is plenty of classism on this site, racism too. Yet when some members feel their particular demographic is being targeted, suddenly, there is outrage.

Pity the same isn’t true of the support for people of colour and the working class. The word hypocrisy springs to mind.

MaizieD Fri 10-Jul-20 12:45:43

I don't think I'm following this very well. Who are 'they'?

GagaJo Fri 10-Jul-20 12:47:46

Older, white women. In the US legislation, particularly focused on the ones that ,are false accusations about black people.

Callistemon Fri 10-Jul-20 12:48:47

As I said, it is an important issue, but is it endemic here in the UK? Have we had any reported cases?

The use of a woman's name to identify a group of people who are intent to cause such mischief is wrong. It detracts from the potential seriousness of what is happening and is nasty and discriminating in its own right.

GagaJo Fri 10-Jul-20 12:53:40

Oops. Typos. *that make false

MawB Fri 10-Jul-20 13:26:44

GagaJo

I think there is plenty of classism on this site, racism too. Yet when some members feel their particular demographic is being targeted, suddenly, there is outrage.

Pity the same isn’t true of the support for people of colour and the working class. The word hypocrisy springs to mind.

Are you saying I or anybody has been deficient in my support for the working class (whatever that is in the 21st century - aren’t we all working class these days?) or people of colour?

growstuff Fri 10-Jul-20 13:35:16

Callistemon

Like Sharon and Tracy, demeaning to anyone of that name but in this case it is far worse, it's vilification of thousands upon thousands of decent, kind women.

I know at least two Tracys as well, both highly educated women and we have a Sharon in the family who was so upset by the connotations that she changed her name.

I've learnt a lot from this thread. However, I don't think the videos I've seen of "Karens" depict "decent, kind women". Without exception, they've seemed ghastly.

These videos sometimes pop up on my Twitter feed. I watched a few because I was curious and then deleted them and blocked the senders. I don't even watch them now.

growstuff Fri 10-Jul-20 13:39:08

Riverwalk

In the UK these pejorative connotations with names and 'witty' alliterations are coined and perpetuated by middle class comedians/journalists, e.g. Essex girls, Croydon facelift, Scousebrow, pram face, etc., and are directly aimed at working class women.

Insidious.

To be fair, there's "Essex Man" as well. He's a cousin of "white van man".

rosecarmel Fri 10-Jul-20 14:48:59

There's quite a collection, male, female, whatever the case may be-

If using names isn't the way, perhaps offer some alternatives of what to call a law for the situation where white women do what they do to black men as in the Central Park Karen case-

Callistemon Fri 10-Jul-20 14:53:53

growstuff I dare say these women are what you say, but why call them all Karen?

Why not pick a term which is not a woman's name?

Let's stand up for all the kind, decent, caring women called Karen in the world of whatever race, colour or creed they may be.

They should all stand together and demand that a different term be chosen for those other women.

Riverwalk Fri 10-Jul-20 15:01:50

If using names isn't the way, perhaps offer some alternatives of what to call a law for the situation where white women do what they do to black men as in the Central Park Karen

The awful woman in the Central Park case has been charged with making a false report, in addition to losing her job.

rosecarmel a law doesn't have to have a snappy name to be on the statute book.

Lucca Fri 10-Jul-20 15:02:46

“Harpy “ “gorgon”. “Medusa”??

Lucca Fri 10-Jul-20 15:03:30

That was to Callistemon

MawB Fri 10-Jul-20 15:05:00

rosecarmel

There's quite a collection, male, female, whatever the case may be-

If using names isn't the way, perhaps offer some alternatives of what to call a law for the situation where white women do what they do to black men as in the Central Park Karen case-

Does everything on the Statute Book have to have a short snappy name?
Laws in the U.K. don’t - oh dear, am I stereotyping another nation again?

rosecarmel Fri 10-Jul-20 15:25:43

Riverwalk

^If using names isn't the way, perhaps offer some alternatives of what to call a law for the situation where white women do what they do to black men as in the Central Park Karen^

The awful woman in the Central Park case has been charged with making a false report, in addition to losing her job.

rosecarmel a law doesn't have to have a snappy name to be on the statute book.

I asked for an alternative- ?

rosecarmel Fri 10-Jul-20 15:30:22

MawB

rosecarmel

There's quite a collection, male, female, whatever the case may be-

If using names isn't the way, perhaps offer some alternatives of what to call a law for the situation where white women do what they do to black men as in the Central Park Karen case-

Does everything on the Statute Book have to have a short snappy name?
Laws in the U.K. don’t - oh dear, am I stereotyping another nation again?

Snappy comebacks: Ok

Snappy Titled Laws: Not Ok

?

MawB Fri 10-Jul-20 15:31:50

rosecarmel

Riverwalk

If using names isn't the way, perhaps offer some alternatives of what to call a law for the situation where white women do what they do to black men as in the Central Park Karen

The awful woman in the Central Park case has been charged with making a false report, in addition to losing her job.

rosecarmel a law doesn't have to have a snappy name to be on the statute book.

I asked for an alternative- ?

We have an offence called Wasting Police Time.

SueDonim Fri 10-Jul-20 15:34:29

If the law really needs a name other than a descriptive, how about the Cooper law? Cooper is the name of both the (alleged) sinner and the sinned against.

rosecarmel Fri 10-Jul-20 15:42:54

MawB

rosecarmel

Riverwalk

If using names isn't the way, perhaps offer some alternatives of what to call a law for the situation where white women do what they do to black men as in the Central Park Karen

The awful woman in the Central Park case has been charged with making a false report, in addition to losing her job.

rosecarmel a law doesn't have to have a snappy name to be on the statute book.

I asked for an alternative- ?

We have an offence called Wasting Police Time.

Excellent! But not specific- It doesn't address the race related occurrence- I do agree that it doesn't need to be called Karen whatever- It's discriminatory- But it does need to be more specific than what you suggested-

MawB Fri 10-Jul-20 15:58:13

rosecarmel

MawB

rosecarmel

Riverwalk

If using names isn't the way, perhaps offer some alternatives of what to call a law for the situation where white women do what they do to black men as in the Central Park Karen

The awful woman in the Central Park case has been charged with making a false report, in addition to losing her job.

rosecarmel a law doesn't have to have a snappy name to be on the statute book.

I asked for an alternative- ?

We have an offence called Wasting Police Time.

Excellent! But not specific- It doesn't address the race related occurrence- I do agree that it doesn't need to be called Karen whatever- It's discriminatory- But it does need to be more specific than what you suggested-

I suggest that is then up to your legislature.
(“Karen” is not exactly descriptive either.)
Surely wasting police time is the same whether the motivation is racially related, religion related or just what lawyers refer to as “vexatious”