As we're still talking about the Charles de Menezes case, there were a catalogue of mistakes - not just the surveillance officer relieving himself. The "suspect" was deemed to be suspicious because he was of non-European appearance and he got off the bus at Brixton Station and then got on another bus. It was thought he was trying to evade any possible surveillance operation. In fact, Brixton Station was closed and he just went to the next station available - Stockwell. Given the seriousness of the situation, wouldn't it have been sensible to have determined why he might have taken that action before assuming he was a real threat to public safety? Anyway, if he was deemed to be a threat, why was he not prevented from boarding two buses and before entering a station?
What I think some people found particularly troubling was the conflicting statements that were given. It was initially stated that officers had shot a terrorist who had jumped over the ticket barrier and run down the escalator. Ian Blair said that de Menezes had been challenged outside Stockwell Station and that a warning had been issued before the shooting. This was later retracted. CCTV coverage of the ticketing area proved that de Menezes had placed his ticket in the barrier in the normal way. Although there was supposed to be CCTV coverage of all other areas, including the platform, it was stated that, for a variety of reasons, the cameras were not operating. Whilst being restrained, De Menezes was shot 8 times - 7 times in the head.
I think most people understand that in times of serious danger when immediate action might be needed, it is possible that even the most highly trained people will make mistakes. What I think is unacceptable is a reluctance to admit such a mistake and/or a possible attempt to mislead the public.
I feel, with some reluctance, that when there is imminent danger of a suicide bomb being detonated in a public place or of mass shootings, a shoot-to-kill policy is probably the only way to ensure safety for the general public.
However, I hope there have been major changes in the way training has been carried out since Charles de Menezes was killed. I'm concerned that the shoot-to-kill policy doesn't go the same way as that of tasering. At the outset, it was said that tasers would be used only in the most exceptional circumstances but the numbers of people being tasered increases every year and there have been many cases where they have been misused.
The Republic of Ireland and their tensions with migrants.