A stroppy child in school wouldn't have the option of being taught in the corridor if refusing to enter the classroom. Why should this man, in custody, be able to cause such a scene and determine how the system operates? Guilty or innocent, it is beyond belief that the system bends to suit him.
We should determine what is a suitable amount of force to use on an uncooperative prisoner, and apply it! Arm restraints, ties, cuffs and a bit of manhandling would get him out of his cell. I don't think that is unreasonable.
Why set a precedent for him? I can see millions of toe-rags in prisons/custody now using the same tactic.
Who is in charge? Sort it out.
Gransnet forums
AIBU
Join the conversation
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join the discussion, watch threads and lots more.
Register now »Already registered? Log in with:
Gransnet »