Baggs
My parents' view was that the actual marriage ceremony is a public event and anyone can attend whether it's held in a church or a regsiter office. And that it's only the party afterwards (used to be the wedding breakfast) that is by invitation only.
Ditto funerals and wakes.
If this is true the hurt grandfather could attend the actual wedding/marriage ceremony of his grand-daughter.
In my view wedding parties (or whatever the preferred term is) are over-rated and in many cases a waste of money. MrB has quoted a statistic several times about the more money spent on a wedding the more likely the marriage is likely to end in divorce. Not sure where he got that from. Has anyone else seen such?
My view too. A timber supplier used by my DH showed him the book of wedding photos to him, telling him how much the whole shebang cost - a lot at the time. About a year later his daughter had run off with the firm's auditor. He was extremely annoyed.
In our twenties we went to the wedding of two friends who had been living together for some time. Father of the bride insisted that, because her parents had put up with the two living together, the happy couple would have to put up with his choice of wedding. It was lovely - bride in Gina Fratini, mother and sister in Jean Muir. 120 people at the reception drank at least 120 bottles of champagne. The food was smoked salmon and caviar. Our old Beetle looked out of place in the car park with the Rolls and Bentleys etc. That marriage lasted less than 2 years.
Yes Baggs, your husband is right.