VioletSky
The fact that people would rather laugh at others comments than articulate an actual answer is why we can't have nice things
Does anyone actually understand the concept of debate/discussion around here or do only your thoughts matter?
Are you serious?
Earlier you posted a long list of things that you presented as extensions of the logic of what we were saying - banning trans parents from schools, stopping gay ones from holding hands etc. They had bog all to do with the argument, and when called on it you claimed that you were being sarcastic.
Is this your idea of the 'concept of debate/discussion'? To waste people's time articulating an answer to a post that you then claim was never serious in the first place? Some of the things said on here are so unbelievable to my ears that I don't know how we are supposed to differentiate between so-called sarcasm and daft ideas.
That was either disingenuous in that when you realised that your attempt to be ironic showed a total misunderstanding of the issues you changed tack and claimed you were being sarcastic, or it was simply disrespectful of others in that letting people waste their time replying doesn't matter to you.
To use your words, (which, incidentally, are far more appropriate when speaking to small children) this sort of thing is 'why we can't have nice things'. It's also why it is difficult to debate.
Back to the topic - I'm another who agrees that books about transitioning are inappropriate for children aged 4-8. An occasional book with a transperson as a character is one thing. I would prefer to see no mastectomy scars or binders, just an already transitioned character doing whatever the story is about, but if a child in the class has trans parents I can see the advantage of their being to see those parents/that parent represented. This one, however, is speaking from the POV of children, which is very different.
Encouraging children of 4-8 that 'it is what you think that matters' may seem liberating, but at that age they really need the security of knowing that the adults around them have their best interests at heart, and that on the whole* they can rely on them to give the best advice, so should follow it. As teenagers they should be able to start exploring 'what they think', but only in the context of having learnt a safe set of boundaries when they were younger.
* Before anyone points out that not all children have caring adults who have their best interests at heart, I am well aware of that. I just don't think that the whole class needs books encouraging individualism at four.
There is nothing wrong with discussions on what it means to be a boy or a girl (something which adults' difficulty with discussing appears to have a direct correlation with their support for having people change from one to another) but 'never mind what others say, only your opinion matters' is not a good message for such young children IMO.