I apologise if I offended or upset anyone with my post, that was honestly not my intention. I was trying to say that having a diagnosis of dyslexia or any spld does not necessarily help or support a child and that a school should put in interventions without a diagnosis if it is evident that a child is struggling in some way. I worked in a secondary school which was recognised by the LA and Ofsted as outstanding in SEN support and I was a dedicated advocate for such children, often going against other teachers and school managers to get the support they needed. I made sure that teachers were aware of strategies to support children in the classroom with dyslexia, dyspraxia, ASD and many other needs as many of these strategies also helped all the children in their classes. I need to rephrase my initial comments to reflect better what I meant. I was not being flippant or dismissive when I said I could read her writing as I agreed that there were some issues and should have suggested that the school do some assessments of her non verbal reasoning to confirm her overall ability - there are several assessments which the school SENCO could do as a general indicator even if they are not qualified to assess for dyslexia, that can only be diagnosed by an educational psychologist. Some of the private assessments centres do not employ such qualified people and so their reports say a child has dyslexic indicators rather than diagnose. There are some good (better) suggestions from other people about how to help this child with the handwriting concerns mentioned in the initial post. I am aware that the child is only 9 years old but it is only a couple of years before she moves to secondary school so I thought my comments about how exam access arrangements worked at GCSE might be helpful as her parents will need to make sure any such arrangements are undertaken from Year 7 to provide a history of need. I used to work in the West Midlands where several parents paid for private assessment from a dyslexia tuition centre and I read the reports. It was evident that the assessor cut and pasted comments from a standard proforma and often got the child name or gender wrong in the recommendations. Hence my cycnism about the validity of some of these reports. Once again, please accept my apologies for any offence that I gave some posters, that was genuinely not my intention and I am upset that I gave that impression. Anyone who knew me as a SENCO will know that I am not uncaring, dismissive or ignorant of spld concerns.
Expensive free range chicken was tasteless!
Anxiety over gc going on days out
As you were a SENCO, I'm amazed - and horrified - at your dismissal of the 'issues'.