I have a flat that I let out through managing agents. They hold the deposit on behalf of the tenant in a tenant's protection scheme. Whilst they take their cut, they do a lot of necessary things like prepare an inventory when the tenant takes up residency and any imperfections are photographed at that time so there shouldn't be any dispute when the tenant vacates the propery. Deposits are there for any damage, not reasonable wear and tear, though I've only ever clawed back money in that respect once when the tenant admittd liability in leaving a burn mark impression of an iron in the middle of the 2nd bedroom carpet, he was my first tenant so the carpet was virtually brand new. It wasn't wilful damage just his carlessness or maybe he was trying to live up to his surname that was coincidentally "Burns". I think if there is any argument about whether it's reasonable for the landlord to hold back any monies from the deposit, the matter has to go to arbitration.
Have any of you got all electric cars? Pros and cons please.
Army horses loose on London streets
Mirtazapine. Any one been prescribed it?
Recommendations please, for a stopover on the way to Loch Tay