Gransnet forums

Ask a gran

DIL here, can I get some help understanding why there’s such an expectation of “alone time?”

(176 Posts)
tellmey Fri 22-Oct-21 01:43:48

I have an older daughter, but I am pregnant currently and this will be my fiancé’s first and his parents’ first grandchild.
His mom seems to have assumed that she will have baby over unsupervised/for overnights, and really acts like there’s no possible way she could have a bond/relationship with him if she doesn’t get to have “alone time” with him.

For one, I am not currently working and don’t need childcare. For two, we send my daughter to daycare for social development and will be sending them both to daycare a few times a week once he is old enough (probably around 1.5) and they will continue at their daycare when I return to work after I finish university.

For two, MIL is a binge drinking alcoholic who is completely wasted by a few hours after noon every single time she has a day off, and her and her husband (step FIL) both smoke inside their house heavily and their home always reeks of cigarette smoke.

She is a nurse, and surely knows that an alcoholic indoor chain smoker is not a good choice for someone to leave your child with, yet seems to assume that just being grandma erases the importance of those two facts.

I will absolutely not be leaving my children with her alone, nor will they be spending time at her house supervised or not (my daughter already doesn’t) because the smoke residue is very unhealthy for children and it makes me ill as well.

I’m just curious for some reasoning from grandparents about WHY there’s this thought that she simply HAS to have “alone time” with my kids lest she “may as well just be cut out completely” (her words to my fiancé.)

I do like my MIL as a person, but I will not be putting the safety and health of my kids at risk to spare her feelings and I don’t feel particularly comfortable leaving my baby with anyone at all until they’re quite a bit bigger.

Also, what’s up with the idea that coming to my house and holding my baby is “helping me?” There’s a thousand things you could do to help me, and holding my newborn baby is not even on the list frankly.

We are doing no visitors except grandparents for the first 3 weeks, and will only be allowing once a week visits at most for the foreseeable future after baby is born. Once we are comfortable with the routine we have built and are ready for it, she is welcome to come to our house and spend time with him as long as she follows recommendations for smokers (wash hands thoroughly, change into a clean non smoked in shirt before trying to hold him and no kisses, which is for illnesses and smoker’s mouth as well.)

We currently see his parents a few times a month, always at his grandpa’s house as I am uncomfortable in their home and uncomfortable having my daughter there with the smoke residue and the smell. The plan is to continue seeing them around the same amount, and in the same places- our house, or grandpa’s.

I think that she has the expectation that the amount they see the baby will be astronomically higher than the amount they see us currently, and I just can’t wrap my head around why someone would think that having a baby makes us less busy as opposed to more. I am of the belief that you should expect to see a couple the same amount or less than you did before when they have a baby, not more.

nanna8 Sat 23-Oct-21 00:16:51

We have a friend who was a functional alcoholic for years and he worked as a mental health nurse. By all accounts he was a pretty good one but we had seen another side to him and just knew we would never have wanted him nursing us. He was handling medication and sensitive things , quite scary. No doubt the pressures of the job didn’t help but that is another issue.

agnurse Sat 23-Oct-21 02:24:17

Hithere

I would agree that a substance use disorder absolutely could affect an individual's ability to provide safe care. In this particular case, given that I don't know the individual in question, I don't want to cast aspersions on their professional abilities.

Froglady Sat 23-Oct-21 07:07:54

Hithere

No, I dont think functional alcoholics can provide good care of anybody.

Have to disagree with you there - as I was once a functioning alcoholic myself who held down a full time job, was able to look after my nieces and nephews (I would never even have thought about drinking while doing that.) Just realised that before they were born I was working as a carer in a children's home and there were never any problems with my drinking.because I just didn't drink while I was on duty and we were on duty sometimes for 4 days and nights in a row. I object to being seen as incapable of looking after people just because I had a problem with drinking. Please stop lumping all problem drinkers together, we are not all the same.

VioletSky Sat 23-Oct-21 12:46:58

Functional alcoholics are addicted to alchohol. I would not knowingly choose a doctor or nurse who might be treating me while preoccupied with when they will next be able to drink or while suffering the affects of withdrawal.

Smileless2012 Sat 23-Oct-21 13:24:48

I think that's rather an insensitive post to follow on from Froglady's who for the second time requested that "all problem drinkers" not be lumped together.

VioletSky Sat 23-Oct-21 13:29:07

No that's not fair.

I was talking about choice, not individual circumstances.

No I would not choose a functional alcoholic to operate on me but then, I wouldn't know so I'm not given that choice and that is wrong imo.

Hithere Sat 23-Oct-21 14:13:40

Thank you VS.

You perfectly expressed what I wanted to say with my post

GillT57 Sat 23-Oct-21 15:27:25

Fair enough, I withdraw my comments about you possibly being a bit controlling, the further information about who will be allowed to visit seems perfectly reasonable. As to the rest of your 'revelations', I am truly astonished that their employers have not noticed that your in laws are functioning alcoholics, it must be noticeable on their breath, their skin oozing the smell of whisky, and as for the driving.....well, like her or not, I would report my mother in law to the police and have them waiting on her drive to breathalise her, this is completely unacceptable and is putting other, innocent people at risk of injury and death. So, on balance, no, I would NOT permit my in laws to have sole charge of my child, in fact the only time they would be free to see their grandchild would be at my home, not in theirs which frankly sounds dreadful. You and your partner need to be united on this. Good luck, and apologies again for my previous statement made on partial evidence!!

welbeck Sat 23-Oct-21 17:12:51

OP, i agree with your decisions and reasoning.
but do you not feel any civic responsibility in regard to your MIL/FIL regularly drink driving.
that is potentially harmful to innocent people.
and if stopped by the police, it may affect her nursing licence.
they need to stop doing that. either get a taxi or don't go.

M0nica Sat 23-Oct-21 17:45:24

We had functioning alcoholics in the family. I was amazed when I found out. I never saw them drink, never saw them tipsy and they never smelt of alcohol.

I have met others since.

Summerlove Sat 23-Oct-21 23:02:52

rafichagran

Farnorth I clearly do know the effects of third hand smoking, but why does a professional woman need to be told to have a change of clothes.
If she has showered and put on clean clothes and does not have a smoke before she visits the baby, that is enough. It is alful to tell her she must have a change of clothes after that. Pure overkill. Honestly I dont know anyone who behaves like this IRL
What the Grandmother does in her own home is her business, but she must accept the baby will not go there.

Because If MIL smokes in her house, all of her clothes will have smoke clinging to them.

So no, “clean” clothes are not enough.

If MIL was as professional as you say, especially as a nurse, she’d know this, and offer to keep “clean” clothing at their house.

It’s not uncommon for heavy smokers.

Bluefox Sat 23-Oct-21 23:49:58

MIL here, I love my grandchildren to bits but it has never occurred to me that I would enjoy their company more without their parents who I also love to bits and want to see.
I’d enjoy spending alone time with them but it’s not especially important for me to do so.
When I was mummy there is no way I would have left my children with someone who I didn’t trust implicitly to put their needs above their own.

asd123 Sun 24-Oct-21 00:13:13

Grandma Showers wtf?never heard of that ,i provide childcare for five grandchildren on different days but i would not want any of them overnight.Your children your rules,never do anything that makes you feel uncomfortable regarding the well being of your children

freedomfromthepast Sun 24-Oct-21 00:37:28

asd123, I think that is more common in the US. I do not believe that baby showers are as common in the UK as they are here?

I think the whole baby hoopla has gotten out of control though. Pregnancy reveals, gender reveals, grandma showers, etc.

I think it is all over the top. I am a traditionalist in thinking one shower for the first baby only so new parents can get help buying things they need for the babies.

If either my mother or MIL had wanted a grandma shower I would have laughed at them. They can waste their money all they want setting up a nursery and getting gifts.

welbeck Sun 24-Oct-21 02:10:35

never heard of showers other than rain or in bathrooms until recently; sounds like another marketing ploy.

Summerlove Sun 24-Oct-21 12:09:23

froglady, I appreciate that you see functional alcoholics differently than most of us, and I’m sorry you are feeling picked on.

However, most of us do not see alcoholics as safe care givers. The culture of binge drinking is so ingrained in UK culture that’s it’s shocking how it’s defended. It’s unsafe behaviour. This is not a one off now and again, according to OP it’s every day off.

In the majority of cases an alcoholic, functional or not, is an unsafe caregiver. They aren’t bad, terrible people, but they are not a consistently safe choice, which makes them unsafe.

Tellmey, keep to your plan. Protect your child. I have no doubt your MIL is a kind person who loves your child. But as you know, that’s not always enough. I do think you need to seriously consider getting in touch with police re driving drunk. Your inlaws could kill people.

Chewbacca Sun 24-Oct-21 13:12:03

grandma showers What now??? freedomfrom please, what on earth is a "grandma shower"?

Hithere Sun 24-Oct-21 13:23:43

Grandma shower is a baby shower for grandma.

rafichagran Sun 24-Oct-21 14:51:40

* Summerlove* I know Grans who are smokers, they are also Grans, they shower wear clean clothes and are clean, when they visit their Grand children they dont have to change into other clothes. What nonsense. I have never heard this happening before or in RL.
The OP is not letting the child go to the Grandparents house she is not letting them have alone time. So long as the Gran does not smoke around the baby and is clean with fresh clothes I see no problems. Honestly just so over the top, and I am a passionate non smoker who hates the smell.
Glad everyone I know uses common sense.

rafichagran Sun 24-Oct-21 15:07:16

If MIL is drinking and driving that is another story and that should be reported.

Summerlove Sun 24-Oct-21 17:45:24

rafichagran

* Summerlove* I know Grans who are smokers, they are also Grans, they shower wear clean clothes and are clean, when they visit their Grand children they dont have to change into other clothes. What nonsense. I have never heard this happening before or in RL.
The OP is not letting the child go to the Grandparents house she is not letting them have alone time. So long as the Gran does not smoke around the baby and is clean with fresh clothes I see no problems. Honestly just so over the top, and I am a passionate non smoker who hates the smell.
Glad everyone I know uses common sense.

I suppose it just depends on if clean clothing has smoke smell clinging to it or not.

I always thought it was common sense to wash your hands before holding a baby. I was proven wrong with that by extended family - even nurses.

Common sense isn’t the same for everyone. Different people have different sensibilities for smoking. No reason to put down those who have a higher sensitivity than you do.

VioletSky Sun 24-Oct-21 17:50:06

I used to be a smoker, I had specific over clothes with a hood I only wore outside to smoke and washed my hands afterwards. It was very much on my mind that I didn't want that stink on me or around my children and this is years ago. After many years of quiting and starting again (especially during pregnancy) I eventually won the battle.

freedomfromthepast Sun 24-Oct-21 18:05:37

This article explains Grandma showers well. www.huffpost.com/entry/grandparent-baby-showers_n_5988f20de4b0d7937389a2c3

Chewbacca Sun 24-Oct-21 18:16:46

Thanks for the link freedomfrom. I got as far as a game of “pin the panties on the granny” grin

Hithere Sun 24-Oct-21 18:30:40

Congrats VS! It is not easy to stop smoking