I was called up about 20 years ago. I served on a murder case. All members of the jury took the case very seriously and all gave a lot of thought to the evidence and verdict. We had to because we knew that if we found a guilty man innocent then we were not giving justice to the victim but if we found an innocent man guilty we were going to send him to prison for a long, long time.
I don't like the idea of a professional jury. Over time they're bound to become jaded and, unintentionally, second guess the evidence having seen similar so many times before. A jury of peers brings a range of people into service who listen and see the evidence with fresh ears and eyes. We took it very seriously because we were new to the system and also, we wanted to be absolutely sure for our own consciences. A professional jurist (like the barristers and court officials) could end up simply seeing it as just another job. Today a motorist, next week a fraud, next week a burglar etc. In fact they'd have to in order to protect themselves i.e. give a verdict and then move on.
What do you find yourself avoiding more as you get older?
America, three headlines today, help me please to understand!


