I ran a computerised telecommunications system. Trained over 600 people to use it, Trained in overseas telegrams and also did some codes etc, so am perfectly able to use computers.
I am very aware of the many possibilities for scams etc. But what some people don't think through is how secure the safety protection of information is. Whilst I am aware of how useful it could be to doctors to have my information available in case of an emergency, but I will not do this as the fact that the NHS does not have the latest in security and therefore I will not be allowing it. We have seen enough just lately of scams and private information being taken. These sorts of problems mean that many times it does not feel sensible to use these things when we are not controlling the end result. I don't expect anyone to sort my problems, and am very independent.
So long as I am not expecting others to deal with my problems, why should I be forced into using things and not have a choice. By all means have the options. But when you assume that everyone can afford to have all the latest up to date things, and end up with a second class citizens situation, where if you don't have a phone you don't get a doctors appointment is very much big brother is watching you, and allowing such as the banks to give very poor or no service and expect you the customer to do all the work. I have made choices all my life and expect to live with the consequences. I do not see why ,if I don't ask for anything from you that I am not entitled to do as I please
Mandelson failed security vetting. Starmer says he didn’t know
Has anyone purchased from “Must Have Ideas”


