Plevey08
MOnica, IMO monitoring what someone has said to another, and showing your disapproval, despite OP explaining it was part of a wider chat about not understanding AI is telling her what she can and can not talk about. Unacceptable. Of course if you are happy to be treated like that or you treat others like that then do be it.
Her husband was not 'monitoring' what the OP said. He overheard it.We all over hear things other people are saying in our home and out, but we are not 'monitoring' them.
I would also repeat, she was not told she must not talk about something. It is clear that someone in their family/social circle as had been scammed and as a result her husband is over cautious about even admitting it had happened. This is not an uncommon reaction among those many people who struggle to adjust to modern technology and are rather frightened by it.
Thee is a big difference between someone saying they do not think you should discuss something outside the family and that person enforcing that opinion in any way. The OP has not mentioned any kind of enforcement.
If anyone, family or not, told me I had said something they did not think I should say, whether I responded to that stricture would depend on the circumstances and whether, on balance, I agreed with them or not. I am sure that at times I have said to a member of my family or friends that I thought something they said was better left unsaid -and they would be completely at liberty to agree or disagree with me.
To me this kind of conversation is part of normal discourse in a situation where people are free to express their concerns about something someone has said or done, or anything else, for that matter. In our family we do not censor each others conversations and have the freedom to disagree openly with each other, without being accused of bullying