Gransnet forums

Chat

What is worth your anger?

(88 Posts)
Greatnan Fri 17-Aug-12 16:20:17

I don't get angry if somebody disagrees with my honestly held views, even when those of us who have the confidence to engage in reasoned debate are labelled arrogant. I don't get angry when I am 'accused' of being a leftie, a guardian-reader, or even when it is implied that I am part of a clique or a gang of bullies because some other members agree with my views.

I don't get angry when I see a misplaced apostrophe, or a spelling or grammar mistake.

I get angry when I see young men and women being returned to their parents in flag-draped coffins.
I get angry when children are starving in countries that spend billions on arms.
I get angry when people in positions of trust abuse children or vulnerable adults.
I get angry when their employers or superiors cover up their foul deeds.
I get angry when girls/women are beaten, tortured and murdered because they don't conform to their parents' cultural norms.
I get angry when any minority group is subjected to discrimination.
I get angry when I read how many people, mostly with mental health problems, have died in police custody.
I get angry when the religious beliefs of a minority are able to influence laws which affect the whole population.
I get angry when mistaken medical information is used to put lives at risk or people are denied proper treatment for religious reasons.
I get angry when I read of the sick and disabled being terrified almost to the point of suicide by the threat of having their benefits withdrawn.
I get angry when the richest get tax reductions.
I get angry when contracts are not put out to tender honestly.
I get angry when well-fed, smug and rich politicians claim to be feeling the same pain as the people who have lost their jobs and cannot find others.
I get angry when somebody I consider to be a war criminal earns yet another £100,000 for a one hour 'inspirational' talk.
I get angry when so few rapists are convicted and I get very angry when women make false rape claims.
I am angry that the surgeon who ruined the lives of my daughter and at least a dozen other women was allowed to continue working when there were 75 complaints against him between 1999 and 2008.
I get angry that there appeared to be no system in place for picking up on his dismal statistics and that none of his colleagues 'blew the whistle'.
I am angry that he has never apologised.

You could say I am a very angry person but not because of some continuing hostility from a person who has never met me - that is not even mildly irritating because it is predictable enough to be amusing.

So, what do you consider to be worthy of your anger?

Greatnan Sun 19-Aug-12 11:43:25

I was googling life expectancy for African Americans (it is, of course, lower than that of white Americans) but I was interested to see that now I have reached 72 I can expect to carry on for another 20 years!

Yes, I know people are much worse in third-world countries, but America is ultra rich so the disparity is more obvious. I guess the lowest economic groups in some African and Asian countries do not have access to TV or internet, so possibly they are not as aware of how wide the gulf is between the richest and the poorest. I don't think telling poor Americans 'Some people are worse off than you' will be much comfort to them. And I believe it is still possible to die in the USA simply because you cannot afford appropriate treatment. That makes me angry.

Bags Sun 19-Aug-12 12:04:35

Leap-frogging back to previous comments, I was thinking further on perceptions of right wing and left wing as regards political outlook, I find it fascinating that there is a recognised biological term for a similar thing that happens between apparently distinct species. The species affected are called ring species and we all know two gulls that belong to such a ring: herring gulls and lesser black-backed gulls.

I refer you to Richard Dawkins very clear explanation in The Ancestor's Tale (my copy's isbn is 0-75381-996-1), as part of The Salamander's Tale, pp308-320. The bit about the gulls is on p311.

Those who insist on distinguishing between right wing fascism and left wing fascism ("the obsession with discrete names") are suffering, in my view, from what Dawkins eloquently calls "the tyranny of the discontinuous mind".

AlisonMA Sun 19-Aug-12 12:19:15

bags you are right. left and right wing are both bad in their extremes. I find it hard to label myself with any political party in the UK as I agree with bits of all of them and disagree with bits of all of them! I have to think very hard at every election and would sometimes like the option to abstain.

Bags Sun 19-Aug-12 12:25:04

You can always cross every candidate (spoil the paper). That's counted as an abstention, but still a vote – a dissatisfied one!

AlisonMA Sun 19-Aug-12 12:30:48

Bags done that more than once but I did rather more than cross each candidate, I made my feeling felt! grin

Greatnan Sun 19-Aug-12 12:32:22

It is hardly necessary to state that extremism of any kind is wrong - it is like those surveys that ask 'Is too much.....bad for you?' The answer is in the question.
I am another disenfranchised voter - there seemed to be a glimmer of hope in 1997, soon extinguished, and then again with the resurgence of the LibDems. Now, a plague on all their houses, and my heartfelt sympathy for those MPs who are honest, hardworking and dedicated. Whatever their party allegiance, they must feel totally betrayed.

Joan Sun 19-Aug-12 12:33:58

My post actually referred to the fact that right wing in Australia is nowhere near as far right as the republican/tea party right wing in America. However, I do agree that right and left politics, when extremes are added to both sides, can form a circle and meet in a repressive authoritarian middle.

In Australia and England, at least we don't have all that religiosity that seems to be dominating the far right of the USA.

Actually, that reminds me of Romney's VP candidate who loves the writings of Ayn Rand. Rand was an ultra right wing writer, probably the original 'greed is good' advocate who rejected all social services, help for the poor, and altruism based politics, taxation, and any constraints at all, on business. But he doesn't like Rand any more, he says, 'cos she was an atheist!

I mean, really, her atheism was the only acceptable part of her!! Oh, by the way, Rand ended her days on Social Security. I guess hypocrisy goes with the territory.

And, back to the thread question, the extreme right of politics makes me angry.

Bags Sun 19-Aug-12 13:14:09

DH thinks the US Democrats are about the same as our Tories confused

Nonu Sun 19-Aug-12 14:25:55

He"s right

POGS Mon 20-Aug-12 21:58:50

Hypocrites
Smugness
People who think they are superior to others
Bullies
Gang Leaders
Micky Takers
People in denile
People who don't think others see through them
Bigots
Homophobia
Paedophiles
Despots
Dog mess

Annobel Mon 20-Aug-12 22:24:06

I abhor extremism whether political or religious - and the two often go together. Have you noticed that extremists almost always have a sense of humour by-pass? Wasn't that the message of 'The Name of the Rose'?

bikergran Mon 20-Aug-12 22:39:53

older rude people that try to push in front of little uns (children) in a que ! hmm