Hey I love the comments about Brookside. I'll pass them on on Saturday. The early years definitely the best I think. Strong characters, especially the Grant parents, and real, biting storylines. It probably ran two or three years past when it should have ended. But with different handling, couldn't it still be running?? The other big soaps survive and survive the odd dip. Brookside for some reason didn't.
Any theories why?
btw one of the best things for us working on it, including the actors, was that it was so innovative behind the cameras. As well as genuinely groundbreaking scripts. All other soaps were (and still are) shot mainly in studios on 3-wall sets. Brookie we shot in real houses on a real close. And PR (Phil Redmond) wouldn't allow walls to be removed or camera hatches to be cut. The rooms were tiny, especially the bedrooms, but we had to stage scenes and shoot in them somehow. Very demanding (and therefore very rewarding) for camera crew, sound, lighting. It made a big difference to the way the show looked. Phil was totally right. And it was all shot with a single camera, like a film. Not multi camera like a sit-com. And liberal use of Stedicam, unlike any other telly show I've ever directed. All that tecchy side could have continued as cameras, and now lights too, have got smaller and smaller. New writers would have come forward. More of them women, more of them non-white.
So. Why didn't Brookside survive when other soaps have??
Shall I start another thread? This is off topic. Or are there only a vert few of us interested and it'll fizzle out? How to know?