Gransnet forums

Chat

What happened to English grammar?

(314 Posts)
Greatnan Tue 06-Aug-13 07:15:56

Headline in The Daily Mail:
The death of the man who sunk the Belgrano: Falklands Navy hero Sir John 'Sandy' Woodward dies aged 81

janeainsworth Tue 06-Aug-13 18:58:57

Ooh Bags! Envious! grin

granjura Tue 06-Aug-13 18:58:44

The important fact being that we do not know, on an open forum, if the subject matter, even if it was not the point of the post, could be hugely upsetting for some posters. How do we know that no-one here, or their close relatives or friends, was/were involved as army personnel in the Falklands war, and met their demise or severe injury there??? Totally irrespective of what we thought about said war. And yes, totally irrespective of the poster, insensitive.

granjura Tue 06-Aug-13 18:54:36

Well, as said, we were always taught that the past simple is 'sank' and that the perfect tense is used with the auxiliary 'to have' + past participle 'sunk'.
But I agree that foreign languages teachers are often more nit picking than native ones smile

j08 Tue 06-Aug-13 18:43:20

"and don't throw stones at the pot."

Totally confused now!

j08 Tue 06-Aug-13 18:41:54

" it was not thought to be at all suitable to the subject. "

I can imagine. hmm

j08 Tue 06-Aug-13 18:40:59

I never said it was deleted (the thread) Elegran.

j08 Tue 06-Aug-13 18:40:18

Do you not know what the words "I remember it was horrific" mean Greatnan?

Greatnan Tue 06-Aug-13 17:57:40

Bags, sunken is an adjective, describing a ship - only verbs are considered to be transitive (taking an object) or intransitive (not taking an object). Shall I go back into pedants' corner!
Is it worth my while repeating that I did not say anything disrespectful about this man, nor about my views on the rightness or otherwise of the War.?
Nor was I making a joke - I consider bad grammar in newspapers to be a serious matter.

Greatnan Tue 06-Aug-13 17:51:40

And I am called insensitive!

j08 Tue 06-Aug-13 17:46:18

Well, as I can't remember it it is hard to comment. It sounds like I got distracted. I must admit the people concerned in that case were not personally k nown to me and so, though I remember it was horrific, it would not have had me completely on the floor personally. Well, you'd go mad would n't you'

Galen Tue 06-Aug-13 17:40:32

bags why would you sink a shop?

Elegran Tue 06-Aug-13 17:33:27

The Annecy thread was not deleted, J08, but your post was, at your request. You posted a little further on, when people had protested :-

"Yes. It was inappropriate. I should not have got sidetracked like that.

I will ask Gransnet to delete those posts." That is still there. you also commented later that you had been joking.

I can't remember now what you originally said, but I remember that it was not thought to be at all suitable to the subject.

Bags Tue 06-Aug-13 17:31:33

#nowtransparentaswellasthick

#talented

Bags Tue 06-Aug-13 17:29:53

I especially respect RAF Rescue helicopter pilots because I've been lifted off a mountain by one of them. Awesome.

Bags Tue 06-Aug-13 17:29:09

I respect the work of the British navy in protecting British interests as ordered from the government.

Will that do?

Bags Tue 06-Aug-13 17:27:57

Fowler says sunken is idiomatic. I like idiom smile

Also that sunken is intransitive (the sunken ship) and sunk is transitive (the shop has been sunk).

Love it! grin

j08 Tue 06-Aug-13 17:26:15

Yes. But I can see straight you. smile

j08 Tue 06-Aug-13 17:25:23

I was against the Falklands war. But you can't not respect this man.

Bags Tue 06-Aug-13 17:25:17

And we aren't repsonsible for the spin you put on ours either, jings. Works both ways. AGAIN.

Bags Tue 06-Aug-13 17:24:40

Just checked and Fowler says sank and sunk are both Past Tense of sink, not past participles. Sorry. So, I think that means either Woodward sunk the Belgrano or Woodward sank the Belgrano are both correct.

j08 Tue 06-Aug-13 17:23:44

What about the thread about the murders near Annecy? There is no way I would have been anything less than sympathetic to the victims in that case. I am not responsible for the spin you might have put on any of my remarks.

Elegran Tue 06-Aug-13 17:21:20

Whatever you want to use Bags. But perhaps its use for a ship which has been sunk would be more "the sunk ship" - but then again you would say "the sunken ship". Getting a bit too theoretical here.

granjura Tue 06-Aug-13 17:19:56

We were taught that 'go/went/gone', or 'see/saw/seen' or indeed 'sink/sank/sunk'

where 'present/past simple/past participle of perfect tense', and cannot be interchanged or else!

Bags Tue 06-Aug-13 17:16:51

Well Fowler's Modern English Usage (ancient edition from 1965 admittedly!) says 'sunk' and 'sank' are both pp but with sank now prevailing especially in intransitive senses. To quote: " sunk is used of what has been sunk especially by human agency".

I'm happy with either. Also happy to be told my edition of Fowler is way out of date! Though I may well use sunk anyhow. #naturallywickedaswellasthick wink

Nonu Tue 06-Aug-13 17:15:58

Oh , didn't read far enough , excuse me !!!