It's a BOY!!

Exactly Callistemon and Merlotgran !

Ssshh!
You’ll wake the baby!

Corbyn is old enough to be the 3rd Mrs Corbyn’s father

Bloody hell if you said the sun was bright someone would say but Corbyn got in the way and made a shadow ?

That's right Annie what's good for the geese is good for gander!

JeniferEccles are there really still people who don'tknow about Boris and his paternity problems (I realise he doesn't know but I thought everyone else did!) (It's 5 legitimate, 1 illegitimate and 1 abortion by the way)-all overlapping relationships..
merlotgran this baby is going to have to be pretty robust anyway given the family connections and his father's infidelities so a few comments from strangers shouldn't be hard to handle.
I sympathise with this baby and wonder how long Carrie will last. If I was her I'd be keeping an eye on all his younger associates.He has a track record.

FFS annie perhaps you could tell us the age of JC’s child with his now wife? Perhaps you could tell us of how he started an affair with his now wife whilst the one before was having cancer treatment?Perhaps you could tell us of the multiple affairs he had during the marriage that produced children? The pregnancies, miscarriage, abortion and child he tried to hide?

I'm sure there are plenty (even on gransnet!) who have illigitate children in their families.

Really, who cares? It's not the 1920s.

Probably some illigitimate ones too!

Even in the 1870s, 1900s etc too, if anyone belongs to a genealogical site, they may find some surprises in their family history MissA

I know quite a lot of people in that boat, and they were all innocent little babies, just like the Boris baby is.

No children doesn’t mean no sex .

The 2nd Mrs Corbyn was pregnant with Corbyn’s child before
she had divorced her first husband.

Surely abortion is ‘the woman’s choice ‘

Just read this thread, um.....how did corbyn appear in this ? What is the relevance ?

I wouldn't have thought it of Corbyn, butter wouldn't melt...

There is no relevance Lucca , but just an excuse to make a nasty remark about Jeremy Corbyn

It would appear so. Really silly. Whatever one thinks of Boris and his offspring bringing corbyn into it is bizarre to put it politely.

I agree with Trisher, I really don't see what all the fuss is about. I am watching the afternoon briefing from the government and once again our part time pm has not appeared. I realise that he has just become a father but we are in a time of national crises, how long would it have taken him to appear. I fully expect a shout down from the Boris fan club but I feel I have should have my say, even if you don't agree.

The fact that Boris has multiple children by various partner was mentioned and then the fact that Corbyn too has various children by different wives as well as a much younger present wife, like Johnson.

Why does their have to be a fun sponge on every thread? Do they trawl around every thread looking for the faintest glimmer of pleasure or happiness just so that they can suck the very life out of it? What miserable, sickly, grey little lives they must have that they can't find even the slightest glimmer of joy or pleasure that a new baby has been born and that it's healthy, loved and much wanted by his family.

Blue sky yes but why corbyn ?? He’s not even leader of the opposition so how is he relevant ?

Chewbacca why do some people want to live in cloud cuckoo land and project some feelings onto other posters that have never been expressed? I am ambivalent about this baby. I don't particularly care about him or his parents. And as for him being loved and much wanted perhaps he is just now but experience suggests that things may change and he may become just like his siblings, overlooked.

Chew, if your post refers to mine, then I would say I am pleased the baby is born safe but that is. Why should I go overboard on someone I don't know and don't particularly like. Also my life is far from sad and grey I am far more concerned about the number dying and the families left behind, children left without a parent or maybe two.

Oh FFS, just leave Corbyn out of this discussion. Pathetic whataboutery. As I said before, I wish the child well, and his parents, but see no reason for celebration. For those of you who have dragged Corbyn into this, I can be pretty sure that Margaret Thatcher would not have approved of his lies and infidelities, of conceiving a child with his mistress while married, but some people will defend behaviour in Johnson that they would seriously condemn in a member of the public. Double standards.

Interesting that you recognised yourselves so quickly.