Ethnic minorities and women only

eazybee - you posted while I was typing. Obvioulsy my post was not in response to yours.

I don't care about a person's ethnicity, gender, religion, sexual preference or anything else about them - the only thing that should be considered is are they the best person for the job

Lol No! They're having a laugh! - surely

Making it clear what qualifications, if any?, are required leaves this open to all.

In the case of GCHQ monitoring communications across the globe diversity would be a big asset, monitoring Chinese messages could well be done best by someone from that background. The same for any other language or ethnicity.

The ad does say it is open to everyone - however only women and those from ethnic minority backgrounds can register an interest

Oldwoman70

I don't care about a person's ethnicity, gender, religion, sexual preference or anything else about them - the only thing that should be considered is are they the best person for the job

Yes, but if your name isn't a western sounding name, there is a good chance your CV isn't read and goes in the bin.

If it has a photograph on it and you're not white, bin.

If you include a date of birth and you're over 50, same.

Male dominant professions, female applicant, trash.

The same for many other categories. Sometimes, groups that are under represented have to be encouraged to apply.

If the best applicant is a BAME female, over 50 and her CV doesn't make it past a cursory glance, that isn't a fair playing field.

From personal experience:

Names and dates of birth are routinely removed from CVs when being read by recruiters.

If you include a photo, the same - it gets removed. Nobody should be including photos or DoB anyway, they are irrelevant.

Given that the name is removed, you can't tell if a CV is for a man or a woman. If a woman (for example) is not offered an interview, or ultimately not offered the job, and they are suspicious that this is because of discrimination, they are entitled to ask for reasons why they were turned down.

Despite what people think, most recruiters try to find the best person irrespective of their background.

Certain groups are encouraged to apply because they are under-represented in the group of people who apply, not just that they are under-represented in the workforce.

It's often quite easy to tell the difference between Male and female applicants from an application form particularly if a woman has had children. Age is also obvious.

Sounds reasonable to me, especially as women and bame are the demographics hit hardest by the pandemic job losses and presumably they want to represent their audience in their hires. Doesn’t bother me ??‍♀️

I suppose it makes a change

Galaxy

It's often quite easy to tell the difference between Male and female applicants from an application form particularly if a woman has had children. Age is also obvious.

If people are determined to find out if someone is male or female there are lots of clues. There are also lots of ways of describing career gaps and how old a person is on ways that don't "give it away"

Anyone who discards a good CV because they think a person is a woman, or from a minority - you probably don't want to work for them anyway.

If a person is determined to exclude certain people then they will find a way. But they better be ready with the excuses.

in ways

The problem is it's almost impossible to prove.

The jobs are open to all.

Step away from the Daily Mail and their racist/misogynistic agenda!

It would absolutely be acceptable in my view.

True Galaxy. But most large organisations are, in my experience, scrupulous about their recruitment. There's always going to be some that are not, of course.

I was once asked at interview if I was going to leave and have a family. Told them they could have me for a couple of years or someone average for as long as they wanted. Was offered the job, turned it down

Oldwoman70

The ad does say it is open to everyone - however only women and those from ethnic minority backgrounds can register an interest

I most certainly did not read this in the Daily Fail. As a matter of principle I do not read such rags. Oldwoman70 seems to have discovered the loophole.
I object strenuously to any type of discrimination.

There is also this example of discrimination. This time in the Telegraph but I am sure it would also have been in the Daily Mail. Most discrimination is against women but that does not mean that discrimination against men should be ignored.
www.telegraph.co.uk/men/thinking-man/best-person-job-flabbergasted-told-old/

I'm more concerned that Philip Davies MP called GCHQ "morons". I really do despair at the level of criticism used by the country's elected representatives.

By the way, organisations such as GCHQ receive hundreds of letters registering interest every year. Most of them will be from savvy graduates (and others) who have been well-versed in the job market. It's possible that there are a disproportionate number from males and people who do not appear to be from an ethnic background. All this would do would be to restore the balance.