Telling anyone who they should be attracted to or open to having a relationships is wrong fullstop
Bonkers people are only representative of themselves fullstop
Labour Brings in excellent Renter's Rights - long overdue.
Sign up to Gransnet Daily
Our free daily newsletter full of hot threads, competitions and discounts
Subscribe
Priti Patel has stated that no longer will trans women's crimes be recorded as a woman's crime. How can public services plan and organise if the data they have is not accurate? In the piece in the Mail today, this was said
“In law, only a male can commit rape, but analysis by Professor Alice Sullivan of University College London shows that between 2012 and 2018, a total of 436 people prosecuted for rape were recorded as women”. This is clearly bonkers!
By recording the crime of rape as committed by a woman, crime figures are skewed. Between 2012 and 2018 we did not suddenly have several hundred women on the streets attacking and raping other women. We had 436 men raping women. But the police and justice system chose, in an effort to be inclusive and putting ideology before biology, to record those crimes as women's crimes. We also had 436 women who probably had to use female pronouns to describe their rapists actions. Of those transwomen convicted and given a prison sentence, how many talked their way into a female prison?
Most of the time it doesn't really matter how an individual identifies. Until suddenly it does matter.
If you have some time on your hands, this series of podcasts on BBC Sounds gives some explanation as to how we got so bemused between sex and gender
www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/p09yk1fy
Telling anyone who they should be attracted to or open to having a relationships is wrong fullstop
Bonkers people are only representative of themselves fullstop
SueDonim the harassment of lesbians who by definition have chosen to have their intimate relationships with women, by those who tell them they are transphobic for refusing the advances of TW is unbelievable.
TW who want sexual relationships with women are in effect heterosexual. That means they choose a partner of the opposite sex, not the gender they have chosen and certainly not someone who doesn’t want a heterosexual relationship. It appears to be another trans-rights over the rights of women. Fortunately it’s still a minority of perpetrators and their fans, but it’s not acceptable.
Are there any cases of heterosexual men being pressured into having sex with TW (some of whom, presumably, have started off as gay men) in spite of the fact that they prefer to have sex with people without penises? If not, is it just that lesbians, being women, are an easier target? 
VioletSky
Telling anyone who they should be attracted to or open to having a relationships is wrong fullstop
Bonkers people are only representative of themselves fullstop
Unfortunately, there seem to be enough of these bonkers people that life is being made very difficult for lesbians who are looking for partners.
People, trans or not, who insist that 'transwomen are women' are part of creating this problem.
Apparently, gay men are also having problems from transmen who want to have sex with them.
I recently heard Arty Morty, on Graham Linehan's youtube, say that people on gay men's dating sites can specify any preference e.g. height, age, race, interests but preference for 'biological male only' is not allowed.
It's just ridiculous!! How did we ever get to this stage? Let's hope we're starting to see the beginnings of the pendulum swinging back.
TERF as (if I remember correctly) Trying to Explain Reality to Fuckwits!
And here we are, still trying.
Chewbacca
.
Wheniwasyourage
It's just ridiculous!! How did we ever get to this stage? Let's hope we're starting to see the beginnings of the pendulum swinging back.
It is ridiculous.
The trouble is, as long as the climate is one of No Debate, and when people can't ask genuine questions without being shouted down or accused of nefarious intent, things like this will happen.
When there are people who always support transpeople over others, support changes to the language that will, if unchecked, result in there being no way to have conversations that differentiate between transpeople and others, things like this will happen.
When dissent is seen as transphobia, and even people who are generally supportive of the rights of transpeople are victimised, things like this will happen.
When people are hounded out of their jobs, and their unions are afraid to support them, things like this will happen.
It has to be stopped, and preferably in time to restore sensible relations between the vast majority of the trans community and everyone else.
So, we can trust men who self ID as women but, we can’t trust male judges to hear rape trials because they may have traditional values. According to Trisha.
This bullying, sexual harassment of women, lesbians, heterosexuals, whatever, by men who claim to be women is beyond disgusting. If misogyny became a hate crime, would that help.
Iam64
So, we can trust men who self ID as women but, we can’t trust male judges to hear rape trials because they may have traditional values. According to Trisha.
This bullying, sexual harassment of women, lesbians, heterosexuals, whatever, by men who claim to be women is beyond disgusting. If misogyny became a hate crime, would that help.
I don't think I have ever said I would trust every transwoman. I certainly don't trust every judge and a lot of barristers will do anything to win.
The problem with making misogyny a hate crime is how likely is it that a prosecution would ever be brought to court never mind succeed? If rape can't be successfully dealt with how will misogyny be?
I was wary of misogyny a hate crime just because of what I saw as the scale of the.problem. But according to pilot studies it leads to police taking other offences against women more seriously.
The same was as racism. Ok, so being racist is not criminal, but behaving in a racist manner, or more to the point, committing a racist act is a crime, and if an existing crime is considered to be racially motivated it carries an automatically higher sentence..
The same could apply to misogyny, and probably would, if men didn’t run the legal system.
I think the prime influence on racism was not the law but education. You change far more by educating and changing attitudes than by prosecutions.
trisher
Iam64
So, we can trust men who self ID as women but, we can’t trust male judges to hear rape trials because they may have traditional values. According to Trisha.
This bullying, sexual harassment of women, lesbians, heterosexuals, whatever, by men who claim to be women is beyond disgusting. If misogyny became a hate crime, would that help.I don't think I have ever said I would trust every transwoman. I certainly don't trust every judge and a lot of barristers will do anything to win.
The problem with making misogyny a hate crime is how likely is it that a prosecution would ever be brought to court never mind succeed? If rape can't be successfully dealt with how will misogyny be?
Misogyny is something that is quite likely to be witnessed by others, rape usually doesn't have witnesses other than the victim and assailant. When you have independent witnesses it is easier to get a conviction.
That’s true, Rosie.
I don’t think that laws should be passed on the basis of how likely crimes are to be prosecuted. If that were the driver it would still be legal for men to beat their wives.
I agree, something should either be illegal or not. Prosecution and conviction rates are irrelevant, especially as they can only be ascertained after the law is passed.
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join the discussion, watch threads and lots more.
Register now »Already registered? Log in with:
Gransnet »Get our top conversations, latest advice, fantastic competitions, and more, straight to your inbox. Sign up to our daily newsletter here.