Glorianny
Doodledog
GagaJo
It's the modus operandi Glorianny. The usual GC routine designed to shut down discussion of a topic.
I work in education, but not with children, so no, I don't know the role of TAs. They didn't exist when my children were at school.
If telling people to educate themselves, ignoring rather than answering questions and 'advising' people not to engage in discussion isn't shutting down a topic I don't know what is.
Are you Mollygo's mouth piece Doodledog?
The subject isn't the referral process it's an ABC book
No, of course I'm not. But you didn't mention Molly until now - it was all about 'the gender critical', wasn't it? a bit like 'some people' as was.
If you must generalise, you have to expect confusion.
Gaga, again, I haven't seen rudeness or demandingness (?) on this thread. Maybe we are at cross purposes, but my idea of a debate is that both sides ask and answer questions. You do it yourself, and you have most certainly demanded answers from others (which I see as fine unless they are SHOUTING).
Debate can't move on unless people answer. Nobody is obliged to answer, but don't you think it is rude to ignore a direct question? If people don't do so threads will become a series of disconnected posts. I realise that reaching an understanding may be a long shot, but it will never happen if people ignore questions. When this has not happened (which has been the case on threads in the past) much more progress is made.