GagaJo
The type of questions I'm referring to Fleurpepper, have been aggressive, leading, antagonistic. Not genuine requests for information. I don't want to go into more detail because it'll be a thread about a thread etc.
I would, of course, dispute that. I am well aware that there is a diametrically opposed view on whether men can become women by saying so. I don’t understand it, and see (or, perhaps naively, saw) threads on a discussion forum as a good place to ask those with those views why they hold them, and how they square what is, to me, an obvious circle.
I can’t see why that is any of the things you claim. How can there be leading questions on something like this? Either you understand why you think as you do, or you don’t. Similarly a question on why a male-born person should be allowed in a female space if he says he’s a woman, but not if he doesn’t is not ‘antagonistic’. Incredulous perhaps. I just want to understand the rationale, as I simply don’t ‘get it’.