JenniferEccles
To my astonishment, saying people should only have the children they can afford, is often not very well received on GN !
It's quite possible, if one were to jot down some £sums, that the low-paid cannot - theoretically - afford to have even one child. In fact this has been true for hundreds of years.
The poor / disadvantaged / low-paid - whatever you want to call them - frequently live hand-to-mouth or are at least one week's wages away from destitution. Poverty replicates itself through the generations, apart from a minority who manage to escape the trap via social mobility or sheer grit and determination. Usually the latter because it is becoming increasingly difficult to find opportunities and options to climb the ladder.
One thing I've realised is that I personally rely heavily on the services and the labour of the low-paid for my relatively comfortable life-style. From delivery-drivers, shelf-stackers, cleaners, shop assistants, warehousemen, gardeners, care-workers, you name it - I can afford things they can't.
So what do we do? Decree that only the well-off should have children?