I don't know the ins and outs of this, but it is now possible to gain results from far smaller traces of DNA than it was in the 1980s when DNA testing came in, and to retrieve DNA from surfaces it could not be retrieved from then. This might be why it was not used then.
I have too a vague feeling that Counsel for the Defence would have had to be aware it was a possiblity and to have requested DNA testing and added it to his bill then.
But that said, it is horrible to think of someone spending years in prison for a crime he did not commit.
Appalling, too, to think that the unknown murderer may have continued murdering women since and never been caught!
Have anyone ever hesitated to get help at home because of not much reassurance
