icanhandthemback
So, Lathyrus, if you were seriously in the sort of danger where people were likely to attack you just for your status, for political or terrorist reasons, are you saying that you would not want adequate protection which might mean someone carrying a gun? If the moral high ground is going to get you killed are you going to take that chance?
I'm not entirely sure that Meghan has ever spoken candidly about there views on hunting but in 2020 it was reported that she was against Harry taking part in them because she disliked them. I don't think, but I could be wrong, that he has taken part in them since then. As for her stance on guns in general, she supports calls for safer gun laws which we know from her letter in 2022 to the Moms Demand Action group.
But I wouldn’t be taking the moral high ground🤔
If I thought a gun was necessary for my safety Id accept a gun was necessary for other people’s safety. Rather than wanting a law that took from others what I consist is necessary for me.
Just interesting to see how people can espouse a principle for others but when it affects them, it is always “different”. And always puzzling when others cant see the contradiction.