JenniferEccles
Wendy Duffy’s only son died in tragic circumstances four years ago and his mother said her heart was too broken to carry on, so she travelled to Dignitas yesterday.
There will be differing opinions of course but who can decide how much anguish anyone can endure?
I lost my Daughter 5 years ago. I don't know Wendy Duffy, but I know her.
There is a word for a woman who loses her husband. A word for a child who loses their parents. Ancient words, in every language, that carry within them an acknowledgment — this person has suffered. Treat them accordingly.
There is no word for a mother who loses her child.
Think about that. As if the people who built our language looked at that particular grief and decided — no. Some things are beyond naming. Some losses are too large to fit inside a word.
Maybe they were right.
Wendy Duffy is 56, physically healthy, and she’s travelled to Switzerland to die. Not because she is ill. Because her son is gone. Marcus was 23. Four years of therapy later, she says nothing has made her whole again. She has already tried to leave once. This time, she wants it to be, in her own words, neater.
She wants the big windows open so her spirit can be free.
The world is looking at her story and seeing a debate. A controversy. A moral and legal dilemma about assisted dying laws.
I look at her and see a mother.
I see the specific weight of a house that still holds the shape of someone who is gone. I see the 3am silences that are somehow louder than anything — the ones where we scream our children's names and the world hears nothing. I see the years of nodding when well-meaning people say time heals — knowing that time doesn't heal this. It just makes you better at carrying it in public.
I stayed. I am still here, five years later. In that time I have sat with other parents who lost their children, and I can tell you this — what Wendy feels is not rare. It is not a crisis of mental health alone. It is the absolute logical conclusion of a love that has nowhere left to go.
We do not recover from losing our children.
Let me say that plainly, because the world needs to hear it.
We survive, or we don't.
And surviving is not the same as living — not for a long time, and for some of us, not ever in the way we lived before. The person I was before I lost my Daughter died the same day she did. What walks around in her place has learned to function, has found purpose, and has even found moments of joy. But she is not the same woman, and she never will be.
Wendy is not broken. She is bereaved. The difference matters.
I am not here to judge her decision. How could I? I have stood close enough to that edge to understand every step of the road she walked to get there.
She is leaving from love — love for a boy named Marcus, love so total that the world without him has never added up to enough.
There is something in that, if we are honest, that is not so different from the love that keeps the rest of us here. We stay for love too. For the ones still living who need us. For the hope, however fragile, that our children's lives meant something we are still meant to carry forward.
But I will not pretend that staying is simply the stronger choice. It is just a different one.
What I want — what I have always wanted — is for the world to build a place for this grief to exist. To stop expecting bereaved parents to return to a normal that no longer exists for them. To find, finally, the word that says: we see you. We know what you carry. You are not invisible. Your loss does not have an expiration date.
Until that happens, there will be more Wendys. Parents quietly disappearing, one way or another, because no one built a language for what they are — let alone a world willing to hold them in it.
Her name is a mother. Her son's name is Marcus.
My name is a mother too. My Daughter has a name.
They all do.