Harry and Meghan. UK Visit.

Personally don't give a stuff about either of them! It's their kids I feel for

The Williams sister will be at Wimbledon the same time so that will be a good photo opportunity.

Barbadosbelle

Merlotgran

Reunited with their cousins??!

They don't know them! Archi left the UK when he was 10-months old and the girl has never met them or stepped a foot inside the U.K.
.

Incorrect.

Lilibet has visited the UK.

They were here for the late Queen’s Platinum Jubilee celebrations, I think it was, and she had her first birthday here.

About the only time we’ve ever seen a proper photo of her.

Thanks Cossy I thought everything the tabloids printed was the absolute truth...they make some of it up??..who knew???

MissAdventure

Its embarrssing to think Harry needs to tell adults that booing his wife isn't on.
How disgusting.

I agree. I don't care whether you like them or not booing is just wrong.
I thought it was awful the way Catherine and her three children were booed by anti-monarchists when in the open carriage at the Trooping of the Colour. Be as against a Monarchy as you like but you don't boo innocent children who have no control over which family they're born into. And the same applies to Harry and Meghan and their children if they appear in public on the visit.

I agree re booing...just don't turn up if you don't like H&M.

Watch out.
We're in danger of agreeing!!

Running out of money
Looking to improve their optics by seeking photo opportunities involving their children and the King
Trying to re-establish some credibility through the existence of their children, especially now there's a third child coming to Eugenie and another young royal having just married they feel the limelight being well and truly filled by others.

Harry's visit for the Invictus planning seems to be required but a visit by his wife with their children to see an ailing king who they have royally rubbished via books and netflix is totally disingenuous. They are looking for publicity.

As a non-royalist I think I look objectively at what's happened and appeared in the global press. The children are being used as emotional blackmail. The parents caused the estrangement. If they want to build bridges they need to eat humble pie and not voice demands.

It’s all a bit sad, isn’t it ?

I agree with every word GoldenAge
They did not think things through. 'Escaping' from the Royal family and thinking they were going to be a success when neither of them are particularly trained or experienced in any area.(other than Meghan having been a mildly successful actor).
Harry's only experience is in being a pampered, protected, spoilt royal person..
Ridiculous, but endlessly entertaining and distracting, especially during such difficult times politically.

How could you possibly say that Harry is not trained or experienced in any area?
How could you say his only experience is in being a pampered, protected, spoilt royal person? Do you feel that his decade in military service working on the front lines of Afghanistan have no merit? Working as an Air Traffic Controller and a Gunner of an Apache helicopter is non-experience? Being the founder of an organization for wounded warriers is not honorable?

I am thankful his kids get to see their grandfather and Im sure the King will be happy too.

MarieElla

Thanks Cossy I thought everything the tabloids printed was the absolute truth...they make some of it up??..who knew???

No need to be sarky!

I’m simply making a point, I often read tabloid “gossip” but tend to dismiss most of it.

I laugh a bit when I read those up in arms about Meghan and how “she was welcomed her with open arms”. It wasn’t quite like that, I can recall our press comparing her on many occasions, very unfavourably, with the British born Catherine.

I think it was a marriage doomed from the start, Harry was besotted with her and Meghan had a Californian actress type of attitude and confidence we Brits don’t welcome. An ill-matched liaison. Quite a sad situation which could have been handled better by both sides and the running off to Canada, then Californian did nothing at all to help matters.

I notice in the few photos released of their children that they seem to live quite an idyllic life, large outdoor areas, lovely weather, bare feet, dogs, chickens. What young children wouldn’t love that life.

Macaydia

How could you possibly say that Harry is not trained or experienced in any area?
How could you say his only experience is in being a pampered, protected, spoilt royal person? Do you feel that his decade in military service working on the front lines of Afghanistan have no merit? Working as an Air Traffic Controller and a Gunner of an Apache helicopter is non-experience? Being the founder of an organization for wounded warriers is not honorable?

I am thankful his kids get to see their grandfather and Im sure the King will be happy too.

Well said, not to mention the support Harry gave in droves to injured veterans, even joining them twice, not the entire time, on fundraising in the Artic.

nanna8

It’s all a bit sad, isn’t it ?

I think so.

Running out of money.Looking to improve their optics by seeking photo opportunities involving their children and the King
I think I look objectively at what's happened and appeared in the global press. The children are being used as emotional blackmail. The parents caused the estrangement. If they want to build bridges they need to eat humble pie and not voice demands.

Couldn't agree more.

Macaydia
I doubt Harry would have achieved any of that had he not been Royal. Basically, he has no transferable skills.
He is not the sole founder of Invictus, moe like its front man.

I did not know that he was given royal treatment while fighting for the British army. I believe the military does give a person business skills but thats just my opinion.

Did not know he was just the front man /advertiser for Invictus.

Looks to me that he is doing a decent job of recovering from mental anguish and drug use therapy, seems to care about his wife and family, but i dont know him at all - just what i see in the news.

I don't know him either but I think he must be aware ,on some level, that he burnt his bridges not by leaving the Royal family but by slagging his family off on the Oprah interview and the book Spare...
If that's what it took to recover his mental health, so be it but I think it's made it worse.

I think he was allowed in as an officer cadet with below the required qualifications - I seem to remember a bit of a saga about it at the time involving the sacking of a teacher at his school?

I'm sure he faced the same physical dangers as other soldiers, ate the same rations etc
​But was he certainly given special treatment in regards to his career path. I expect this was done by the British government and military together.

I know entire media blackouts were constructed for him and his postings were changed to balance his desire to be with his fellow soldiers with the risks involved and keeping him safe.
Wasn't he due to go to Iraq and the head of the army pulled him out?
Presumably him being there would make his whole regiment more vulnerable.

I also think there was some dubious manoevering when he was accepted to train to fly Apache helicopters...

I don't really care (and honestly don't know a whole lot) - but I'm sure he was given special treatment.

Macaydia

I did not know that he was given royal treatment while fighting for the British army. I believe the military does give a person business skills but thats just my opinion.

Did not know he was just the front man /advertiser for Invictus.

Looks to me that he is doing a decent job of recovering from mental anguish and drug use therapy, seems to care about his wife and family, but i dont know him at all - just what i see in the news.

I’m assuming “none of us” on here know him.

I think he’s an emotional mess and should have married someone entirely different. Doesn’t make either of them “bad” people.

I’d argue as well that anyone who has had the education he enjoyed and his 10 years in the military have given him plenty of “transferable” skills, which he should have used rather than whatever is it they both bumble around doing!

MarieElla

I don't know him either but I think he must be aware ,on some level, that he burnt his bridges not by leaving the Royal family but by slagging his family off on the Oprah interview and the book Spare...
If that's what it took to recover his mental health, so be it but I think it's made it worse.

I utterly agree! That whole saga was utterly awful, he could have paid for private (very private) therapy and recovered that way.

Still if people (general public) hadn’t bought his book and watched his interviews …. 🤷🏻‍♀️🤷🏻‍♀️

GoldenAge

Running out of money
Looking to improve their optics by seeking photo opportunities involving their children and the King
Trying to re-establish some credibility through the existence of their children, especially now there's a third child coming to Eugenie and another young royal having just married they feel the limelight being well and truly filled by others.

Harry's visit for the Invictus planning seems to be required but a visit by his wife with their children to see an ailing king who they have royally rubbished via books and netflix is totally disingenuous. They are looking for publicity.

As a non-royalist I think I look objectively at what's happened and appeared in the global press. The children are being used as emotional blackmail. The parents caused the estrangement. If they want to build bridges they need to eat humble pie and not voice demands.

I am sure the proposed visit by the children to a, to me, unimportant event ‘ One year till Invictus’ is simply a ruse to force Charles’s hand towards a public reconciliation of some sort. If he doesn’t play ball, they’ll be hoping his credentials as grandfather will be damaged, and the Sussex supporters ( a dwindling number, maybe?) will be decrying him for ignoring his grandchildren.
Now I am no fan of the pair, Meghan in particular, but I would like to ask all those quoting their ‘bile’ or ‘vitriol’ towards the royals to share some examples. Of course they were critical of the institution, and said things like there were ‘ concerns about how dark the baby’s skin would be’, as well as giving ‘varying recollections’ of Meghan not being allowed out or having her passport taken away, but I don’t recall bile or vitriol.
I think the plan was half of the time carrying out royal duties, then flogging Meghan’s outfits online, or sharing the recipes from state banquets in a TV show, but Queen Elizabeth quite rightly scotched that idea, and the American dream isn’t going to plan, so UK involvement is looking more and more necessary.

Btw, both AI and other sites state

“The Invictus Games were founded by Prince Harry, The Duke of Sussex. He established the international multi-sport event in 2014 after being inspired by the United States' Warrior Games and seeing firsthand the power of sport in the recovery of wounded, injured, and sick service personnel.”

Allby himself, I'm sure (He just takes he credit for others' work)
Anyway, it's going to be very entertaining when William is King ..

Cossy I just put your post into Gemini and asked "is this true?"

Here's the response:

It was not a solo effort, he was the frontman and catalyst. Executing an international multi-sport event in less than ten months required a massive, high-powered team:

1. Sir Keith Mills
​If Prince Harry was the spark, Sir Keith Mills was the operational engine. He is the brilliant sports administrator who served as the Deputy Chairman of the London Organising Committee for the 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games. He brought the heavy-duty logistical blueprint needed to pull off a massive sporting event on tight deadlines.
​2. The Royal Foundation
​At the time, the project was backed and delivered by The Royal Foundation of The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge and Prince Harry. Prince William and Catherine were co-patrons of the foundation, meaning the joint charity’s infrastructure, staff, and initial funding (£500,000 from its Endeavour Fund) were heavily utilized to get the games off the ground.
​3. The Ministry of Defence (MoD)
​The UK Ministry of Defence partnered directly with the foundation to coordinate with wounded personnel, manage military logistics, and help select and support the British competitors.
​4. Public and Private Backing
​Government Funding: Chancellor George Osborne pledged an additional £500,000 of public funds (taken from fines imposed on banks involved in the Libor scandal).
​Corporate Sponsorship: Major companies, most notably Jaguar Land Rover, stepped in to provide the necessary commercial backing.

​So, while Prince Harry is legally and historically the Founding Patron—meaning the idea came from him—he had an army of Olympic organizers, government officials, corporate sponsors, and his family's foundation working around the clock to actually build it.