I am just reading an article in this week's Economist. The first comment that leaps out is:
"Low case numbers, though, should not be taken to signify successful containment; they are often a measure of ignorance."
It then goes on to describe what has happened in the USA.
“Test and you shall find,” says Gabriel Leung of the University of Hong Kong, who was also on the WHO team. “You either test and find it early, and do something about it, or the body bags are going to pile up", he adds
This is not happening in the USA. Their private healthcare system is a nudge in the direction of not saying anything and not having to pay for the test.
In a population without measures in place to control such chains, a single undiagnosed case can, in principle, give rise to more than 3,000 cases six weeks later. On March 4th, while Mr Trump blamed his predecessor, Barack Obama, for the CDC’s problems, Andrew Cuomo, the governor of New York, revealed he had asked 1,000 people in Westchester, where the infected lawyer lives, to isolate themselves.
The article then contrasts this with South Korea where:
... the government is being forthright and formidably transparent, allowing Koreans to trace their possible brushes with the disease. As well as briefing the press thoroughly twice a day, and texting reporters details of every death, the government puts online a detailed record of each new patient’s movements over previous days and weeks, allowing people to choose to shun the places they visited. The risk of illicit activity being thus uncovered—at least one extramarital affair may have been—gives people an extra incentive to avoid exposure to a disease which, in most of the infected, results in only mild symptoms.
Where do we stand by comparison I wonder.