A peculiar (tosay the least) post on astrology has popped up again today, (about "scince" v astrology) from one of the posters on this thread, who, I notice, has mentioned a site. Could he/she be trying to promote something, do we think??
OK anagram if we are splitting hairs twelve and a half per cent of the population share each of our zodiac signs (approximately - I think the birth rate is not evenly distributed through the year - there are clusters nine months or so after Christmas/New Year and after the summer holidays)
But we are talking about astrology here, do accurate sums matter all that much?
Maybe the other 4% were born under a wandering star anagram ? Maybe they are aliens born in another galaxy under other zodiacal systems ? If we are to start believing this astrological guff we might as well go the whole hog. As Specki says - STUPEFYING co-incidence.