My mother went to grammar school. She didn't go to university, foolishly chosing to go the 'arty' route. Which pretty much sealed her fate for poverty later in life.
However, her grammar school education put her a step above most other working class girls/women. The knock on effect of this was to give her children the value of education. We went to comprehensives (which were then and still mostly are bad) BUT went into further education later in life, DUE to our value of education instilled early on by our mother.
Both of her children are now postgraduates and earn good salaries. The knock on effect of a grammar school education.
As a teacher now (have worked in 5 UK comprehensives), I can testify, comprehensives mostly don't work. The lower level students drag down the education of the higher level ones. Cruel, but true.
I don't have a solution. Or I'd be a politician. I guess the same old things for teachers. NOT pay. Reduced workload. An exhausted teacher can't give those higher level working class children the extra time they need to counteract the lack of entry advantage middle-class students have. Handling bad behaviour day in, day out is part what exhausts teachers. Also 35 students per class. The sheer amount of lessons taught (each lesson necessitates at least 30 minutes planning). Marking. Meetings. Data. Reports.
I teach just as many hours now in a private school. But no behaviour issues. Much smaller classes. And my stress load is more than halved.
Should Gransnet delay the first posts from new posters?