Madgran77
*Considering how serious child abuse is, it’s continually appalling to me that there are folks who honestly suggest that non-abusive parents ending contact with unpleasant relatives can ever be ‘abuse’.*
The assumption above is that they are "unpleasant!" I have seen noone suggest that contact should continue with a child abuser by the way (unsurprisingly!)
And how significant for that assumption to be followed by a poster giving a "grandchilds" adult perspective, including a recognition that it could have been caused by a "difficult" personality. ( so sad for you nanna8)
Who knows ...but assumptions should NOT be made, every story is different!
I think it comes down to each individual’s understanding of abuse.
I read a comment on another thread last night (I can’t remember what it said exactly, so I’m just surmising) suggesting that if a grandparent can’t stop themselves speaking about a child’s parents in a negative way to the child, then contact between the grandparent and child should always be supervised.
To me, that comes under the umbrella of emotional abuse. So why is contact in that situation being encouraged to continue?



are you referring to GP's ignoring the abuse their GC are suffering User7777?
.