This is old news from a year ago. I'll repeat my posts from above, because events since then have shown that "divide and conquer" is a tactic still being used, to great effect! -
"Do read ALL the questions in the poll, such as -
Q18. In matters of potential major permanent change such as Brexit there should have to be a majority of the vote in each of the four nations of the UK separately, as well as in the UK as a whole, in order for the change to take place. 63% yes 37% no.
Q20b. Regardless of how you answered the last question, {which items should be on the ballot paper} do you think there should be *a new referendum on Brexit?*
59% yes, 39% no
How come those newspapers (Sun, Express) don't mention these results, yet make headlines of the 32% yes, 68% no "disenfranchise the over-70s" one?
Once again when a "shock poll" apears, we need to consider -
How many people were consulted for this survey? 2013 [not a lot!]
How were they selected? Online (That is, they were self-selected by those who had an axe to grind, and were computer literate - not many over-70s were asked their views, then.)
Exactly what questions were asked, and how were they worded? See the detailed results here for them - www.drg.global/our-work/political-polls/wings-over-scotland-poll-11th-october-2019/
What was the choice of answers? Limited
Who is reporting on the poll? The Sun, the Scottish Sun, The Express. So far.
I am definitely NOT a conspiracy theorist, yet I do wonder whether the seeds of resentment are deliberately being sown and the seedlings watered by those with an interest in the destabilisation of the country, for their own advantage.
I would look East, to Putin who has successfully dabbled in US politics and is known to have an aim to defeat the West and capitalism on all fronts. When the dust has settled on Brexit and on all the inter-generational and other internal conflicts that are so disturbing us, a lot may emerge that is not visible now.
Who would have thought that a Republican candidate for the US presidency would be associated with aides who were consorting with a foreign power to influence internal politics?