As I'm now retired, I feel less inclined to stick to rigid mealtimes. I always have breakfast, I know that that's Health Gospel.
But today I had a snack at 2pm then lunch at 5pm and supper around 10pm. I live on my own. Why not eat when and if? I'm eating much less as I get older anyway.
My non-live-in partner is not of this mind re mealtimes. Lunch preferably at 12.30. Evening meal at 7.30/8pm.
My previous spouse was an out-and-out Mancunian. Needed the evening meal ("tea") at 6pm, or better still 5.30. Any food after 7pm, apart from cheese and Jacobs crackers, was soft, mind-rotting Southern affectation. The marriage didn't last.
Does anyone stick to rigid mealtimes in older age, if it affects no-one else?? Why? Are rigid mealtimes genuinely healthier?
Similarly (but different) I'm realising that in retirement, there's no real difference between the week and the weekend (apart from Church on Sunday evening). And there's no reason to think different from that and there's no harm in it. Anyone disagree?
Significant rise in both anti-semitism and Islamophobia
Reform UK’s Richard Tice allegedly failed to pay £100,000 in corporation tax
Good Morning Monday 20th April 2026




