MissAdventure
The budget is £1 a day though, not per meal.
If that was to me - I know.
Do GNers have any suggestions for eating for a £1 a day?
Total food should be about 1,500-2,000 calories a day and well-balanced, ie good balance of carbohydrate, fat and protein.
Ideally, there should be little cooking (to save on fuel) and few cooking utensils (certainly nothing fancy) should be needed.
MissAdventure
The budget is £1 a day though, not per meal.
If that was to me - I know.
I can't remember who it was to, actually, but it wasn't you. 
It was just a general "where the hell is all this seasoning coming from" comment to anyone.
So is that per person or family?
So a couple with child would get £3 per day?
I would say it is well nigh impossible. Yet another example of Government being blind and kicking the can down the road. When the cost to the NHS of children ( and adults) having not been able to eat nutritionally rears it’s head it will make the amount that could be spent now on an uplift to Universal Credit seem totally insignificant.
One of the reasons I quoted that recipe is that each and every household will be different. I applaud Growstuff for trying to do this but I have a feeling we will get to the comunity kitchens stage before the government takes its head out of the sand.
It simply can’t be done with nutritional requirement of various stages of growth etc in mind.
I think sharing of ingredients, meals, and shopping is an excellent idea.
Nobody where I live is interested, sadly.
Buying 3 cucumbers for a bargain price is a waste when one goes off before you've eaten it.
So much better to split items.
Community Pantries must help be we don't have one in our town.
Yes I agree MissA. When I see all this lovely produce at our market it seems such a shame not to buy and share.
We have a stall set up that sells excellent fruit and veg.
They sometimes sell a big washing up sized bowl of stuff off.
Then you have to figure out if you actually need 9 lettuces, and factor in that it may still be a bargain even if you lose 3.
I usually (used to) cut the tops off and regrow any that were spoiling.
Tomatoes - I know I will eat every last one of, so I buy those.
MissAdventure
Nobody has said poor people refuse to eat porridge made with water.
A lot of folk simply prefer it that way, regardless of finances.
It's also more nutritious with milk and the GI is lower.
I've actually done an experiment with porridge to show the effect on blood glucose levels. I've tested my levels after eating porridge with water and with milk. Porridge with water makes my blood glucose level rise higher and it takes ages to come down. I don't really like porridge with water anyway, so if eat porridge, I always have it with milk.
Oh, that's interesting isn't it?
Pretty relevant to poverty and health, too.
growstuff
MissAdventure
Nobody has said poor people refuse to eat porridge made with water.
A lot of folk simply prefer it that way, regardless of finances.It's also more nutritious with milk and the GI is lower.
I've actually done an experiment with porridge to show the effect on blood glucose levels. I've tested my levels after eating porridge with water and with milk. Porridge with water makes my blood glucose level rise higher and it takes ages to come down. I don't really like porridge with water anyway, so if eat porridge, I always have it with milk.
That's good but it's still possible to make edible and unlumpy porrridge with water. That's how it was traditionally made when using oatmeal rather than rolled oats. The oatmeal was soaked in water overnight.
If you make it like this, especially if you keep it thick (but not lumpy), you can add milk before eating it. That help nutritionally as well as helping to cool it down.
I'm actually an expert at making non-lumpy porridge. So much so that when I helped with guides and scouts, even the ones who said they hated porridge at camp ate the stuff I made nae bother, having refused it when made by others.
My mum liked it stodgy, no milk in the making, but milk dribbled on top.
I miss that woman!
My porridge is never lumpy either, but that's not my problem with porridge. The problem is that on its own it contains a lot of carbs, which I just can't tolerate. Does it taste different if you add the milk before or after you've made it? Nutritionally, I would have thought it's the same. Milk brings the overall GI down, just as butter on toast and cheese on a baked potato do, as well as adding extra protein and fat.
I think it tastes creamier with the milk added before, but it may be a load of rubbish. I presume it is creamier because the milk soaks into the oats so you use more.
My mum used to make it with water and we got a stingy dribble of golden syrup on top. Letting the syrup (or treacle as we called it in Yorkshire) dribble off one's spoon and make patterns in the porridge was half the fun.
The point about making it with water on this thread is that it's cheaper than with milk. Apparently really trad Scots would add salt rather than sugar!
MissAdventure
I can't remember who it was to, actually, but it wasn't you.
It was just a general "where the hell is all this seasoning coming from" comment to anyone.
Yes, a lot of the meals are reliant on having a well-stocked store cupboard of basics to start with.
It's a good idea to soak cheaper oats overnight before cooking in the morning.
Coeliacs may have a problem with oats (avenin) as well which makes eating cheaply very difficult.
Cheap isn't a bargain if you can't eat something because you don't enjoy it, though.
If someone can only enjoy it milky, they'd factor in those costs.
It would still be reasonable though, I reckon.
Lidl stores often have a large box of mixed just-on-date fruit and vegetables for sale for £1.50 but they are situated just beyond the tills.
Daddima
You’d think he would know that tomatoes ‘on the vine’ were more expensive.
Salmon paste with only around 9 grams of protein-hmm.
My biggest concern about that lovely bit of ‘look what I can do’ vs is that the bodily energy + car fuel energy + cooking expended in making that video far outweighed the nutritional value of the meals.
But at least he’s keeping his mind active.
You would need to work out if it was worth buying a box of fruit and veg.
If any isn't used, then it's a loss from an already limited budget.
It's easy to spot and know about bargains when you see them.
Anyone can do that: the art is making meals that fit around them, consistently, and nutritionally.
Cheap isn't a bargain if you can't eat something because you don't enjoy it, though.
Anything that stops you from starving is a bargain!!!!!
Teenagers 10 - 15
Require (slightly lower for females) 2400- 3100 cals per day
Nutrients as above same proportion
It would be difficult to fill up a teenager on £1 per day.
School dinners are about £2.50, not very nutritious and often just junk food.
If all children got a good, nutritionally balanced school dinner either free or subsidised then that would solve a lot of problems.
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join the discussion, watch threads and lots more.
Register now »Already registered? Log in with:
Gransnet »Get our top conversations, latest advice, fantastic competitions, and more, straight to your inbox. Sign up to our daily newsletter here.