Battle of the breakfast

Honestly I wouldn't of had the patience , if he didn't want it then he could of gone hungry.
Never been in that position but I do think life is too short to make a child sit for hours over a bowl of breakfast cereal.

Admire you for your patience!

Like Tanith I do not think I would have had the patience but I always made it clear to DGS that if he did not eat ALL his meals there would be no treats and it worked.

DiL had to go out and had left tuna pasta bake ready to be re-heated for the boys' tea. I sat them down and put the plates in front of them, at which they staged a strike. 'Don't want it'. 'Too bad,' I said. 'It's all there is for you.' After a few minutes they were still rebelling so I picked up the plates and headed for the food recycling bin. 'No, no, Granny! Don't do that!' And they ate it up - every bit. I can't say I always win a power struggle with the two of them ganging up, but that was a small triumph.

I don't think I would have given him FIVE Weetabix all at once to start with, though. Two at first, then more, one or two at a time, WHEN he had eaten the first helping. It does make him believe that wasting large helpings of food is OK - to pile his plate, then not eat it.

It takes time and patience to get it over to children that this is not acceptable behaviour.

My friend (never married and no kids) and I are neighbours too, and a little lass age 6 who lives in the house between our two, has befriended us. I wrote a thread about her a while ago. Anyway, we were all in my friend's above ground pool, when she noticed little Harmony was wearing earrings. She told her to remove them as they might prick the plastic lining.

Sulky silence.
Pleas that she'd be careful.
More sulks.
Even more pleas
Even more sulks.

My friend stuck to her guns, and eventually the little lass took them off, and the stand-off was forgotten.

Sticking to your guns can be hard, but it is easier in the end. And better for the child.

tanith the problem is that when he's at my house he usually behaves very well, but recently because his daddy's away he's got into the habit of ruling the roost a bit at home and my poor daughter is finding his constant challenges difficult to deal with. As I said up there ^ he was quite happy to sit at the table humming and singing and carrying on conversations with me. If it had been something he didn't like or hadn't asked for I would have allowed him to leave it.

Elegran it says the child is 5yrs not that she gave him 5 Weetabix

Elegran it was just ONE weetabix, not five.

I see your point grannyactivist but I think just taking it away and letting him go hungry till lunch time would of made the same point rather than wasting a whole morning with both of you 'stuck' doing not very much at all. Well that is what I would of chosen to do anyway, I can't bear wasting time and am short on patience if it works for you then all well and good.

No I wouldn't have had the patience either.

DD method is, if they've started eating they are given extra time to finish. If they are still refusing when the adults have finished it's binned.

I do try to encourage the younger one, 'just a little for nana' but if the five year old refuses, tough.

I'd have insisted he ate one mouthful and then let him go hungry.

I would have tried to get him to eat, then removed it and allowed him to get down from the table. Nothing else to eat till lunchtime, by which time he might feel like eating more.

One of my grandsons, 6, tries to engage me in these games and I tell him in words of one syllable that I am not playing. The food is there for eating - if he can't manage after two bites, that's fine - he can leave the table and look forward to his next meal. He's quick to return and eat more if he sees his twin brother eating something he fancies for dessert.

I admire grannyactivist. The long 'stand off' wasn't just about the bowl of cereal (which dgs had specifically asked for). It was about boundaries and respect. IMO.

And it's unlikely she will ever have to do again, or at least not for so long.
Granny in charge, granny rocked. Well done.

I speedread it, GrannyA and attached the 5 to the Weetabix, not the child!

The daughter of a friend of a friend was a late first child, very much adored and indulged. My friend told me how she had been in their house and witnessed this -

Mother - "What would you like for tea, dear?
Child - "Umm - bacon"
Mother - There is no bacon in the fridge. Never mind, I will go to the shop for some."

Trip to the shop for a packet of bacon, which is opened and cooked.

Child - I don't want this"
Mother - "Well, what would you like instead?"
Child "Fish fingers"
Mother - I will have to go to the shop again"
Child "That's what I want"

Another trip to the shop, for fish fingers.

This incident was not about the food. It was about power and pushing boundaries and we both knew it. This same child's mother used to faff about every morning at about age 6/7(even though she was always up early) and not get dressed until the last minute. Finally I warned her that from the following day if she was not ready on time I would walk her to school in her pyjamas.
And I did.
From then on she never had a problem getting ready for school on time.

Fortunately my grandson doesn't hold grudges and is very pleased that he ate all his breakfast yesterday and we've had a lovely day today.

DD has done the walk to school in your PJ's

Good on her, and you ga I'm not sure I'd have the conviction.

There are more creative ways of dealing with this situation that allowing it to deveop into a power struggle and a head on clash of wills. After all who is the adult in this situation?
Children need to learn the consequences of their behaviour. The chances are the child will be hungry before too long. If they are not hungry then fair enough.
So long as the child has been warned the consequences of not eating the breakfast then they can expect no more food until lunch time.
End of.

I think we all deal with such things in our own way but it is important that once you have made your pitch you stick to it.

DS and DiL have separated and DGCs behave totally differently with one than they do with the other and they are very young. Children very quickly know what they can get away with with different people and it is better that they learn what the boundaries are if the boundaries are consistent.

Ga Did you ever see Spring and Port Wine?
I too would have gone for 'you can leave the weetabix but nothing till lunchtime'. And stuck to it.
I'm not sure it's a good idea to make children lose face completely.
If you let them have a win-win outcome, rather than a win-lose, their dignity is still intact, but they will still have learned the hard way that their choices have consequences, and perhaps a little responsibility too.

Well done GA. I may not have had the patience, I may have left him whilst I cleared up and washed the dishes, then given him one more chance to eat it before taking it away and then nothing until lunch-time.

I remember Spring and Port Wine. (However, the daughter who refused to eat the herring was pregnant as far as I remember )

JaneA that was always one of my favourite films. Was it a herring or a kipper the daughter wouldn't eat?

A kipper I think, Ann. That was the only way it could have lasted a week

gaI feel exhausted just reading about your battle of wills. My take on this would have been to sit at the table with him, eating my own breakfast happily and chattering. When I'd finished, I'd ask him once if he was 'finished'. If he clearly wasn't going to eat it, I'd have just cleared the table, chatting about the day ahead. All very matter of fact. I'd repeat it the following day, and so on. Nothing until lunch except drinks.
I wouldn't have engaged in all the extras.
Pleased he ate up all his porridge the following day.