Gransnet forums

Health

Coca-Cola and sugar

(337 Posts)
Anya Tue 13-Oct-15 13:48:52

Has anyone been following the investigation by The Times into the full scale of Coca-Cola’s funding of scientists?

It would appear that this funding has been used to influence research, and the extent of this has come to light after the government rejected a tax on sugar sweetened drinks, despite support from Chief Medical Officer Dame Sally Davies, the British Medical Association and TV chef Jamie Oliver.

The drinks firm is said to have links to more than a dozen British scientists, including government health advisers, who counter claims that its drinks contribute to obesity

Coca-Cola is said to have provided support, sponsorship or research funding to a variety of British organizations including UKActive, the British Nutrition Foundation, the University of Hull, Homerton University Hospital, the National Obesity Forum, the British Dietetic Association, Obesity Week 2013 and the UK Association for the Study of Obesity.

Through its trade organizations, Coca-Cola representatives have met government officials and ministers more than 100 times between 2011 and 2014, according to The Times. Coca-Cola is also said to host a parliamentary dinner.

Faculty of Public Health board member Simon Capewell accused Coca-Cola of trying to mold public opinion.

“Coca-Cola is trying to manipulate not just public opinion but policy and political decisions. Its tactics echo those used by the tobacco and alcohol industries, which have also tried to influence the scientific process by funding apparently independent groups. It’s a conflict of interest that flies in the face of good practice,” he said.

New York-based nutrition researcher Marion Nestle warned scientists should not take money from Coca-Cola.

“In my opinion, no scientist should accept funding from Coca-Cola. It’s totally compromising. Period. End of discussion,” said Nestle, a professor of nutrition, food studies and public health.

Quotes taken from The Times

thatbags Fri 06-Nov-15 19:25:09

Actually, gj, jings' last two posts express her perfectly reasonable opinion very clearly. I'm not sure she needs to learn anything new about sugar.

jinglbellsfrocks Fri 06-Nov-15 19:32:23

Thank you Bags. Couldn't have put it better meself. smile

granjura Fri 06-Nov-15 19:39:48

My post was in response to this:

'Can't be bothered to read all these boring links.' and another post about waste saying just 'rubbish'. Jingl has made her opinion about sugar, carbs and calories so very clear, so many time- now that is boring for some of us, and serves no purpose to just repeat again and again. What is the point? Especially if not interested in reading about any evidence presented?

jinglbellsfrocks Fri 06-Nov-15 19:51:46

And you think other people's posts on this thread are not boring? Just mine? Thanks for that. hmm

jinglbellsfrocks Fri 06-Nov-15 19:53:31

Why do you always have to start bitching at me? It's always been the same hasn't it? Goes back literally years now.

granjura Fri 06-Nov-15 20:11:31

Don't be silly now- YOU wrote the links are boring...

all I am saying is that some of us find the links interesting, but that someone just dissing them and repeating NO again and again is boring. Just be consistent, please.

Anya Fri 06-Nov-15 22:18:37

Yes I know Elegran

jinglbellsfrocks Fri 06-Nov-15 22:21:47

"Don't be silly now"

Typical. hmm

jinglbellsfrocks Fri 06-Nov-15 22:24:14

Is the opposite of a not open mind, a closed mind? Or is there a halfway point - a sort of squinting mind? confused

jinglbellsfrocks Fri 06-Nov-15 22:24:33

moon

Anya Fri 06-Nov-15 22:41:15

jingl a bit like a door perhaps? Open, shut, half open, wooden or glass...... moon