GrannyRose15. The arguments you use are uncomfortably close to those used by many of ex-President Trump's more extreme supporters.
But the limit on all these Human Rights is that in exercising them you do not deprive others of their human rights. In this case, your demand to freedom to go where you will could directly lead to a potential lifetime of disability and even death of other people.
Given, that if you exercise your right to visit your second home, so will everybody else, we could now be looking at a pandemic that has killed, not 100,000 people in Britain but 200 or 300,000. How does that square with their right to life?
Statements like our democracy is at risk and far more people are going to die as a result than have died of Covid 19 are frankly just ludicrous. Of course there must be a balance between an individual's human rights and the rights of Society as a whole, but we have a history of introducing countyry wide curbs in times of emergency, especially health related ones. Do you remember the restrictions on visiting the countryside, walking footpaths, moving in and out of farms with cattle or sheep during epidemics of foot and mouth, disease, swine fever, etc. Controls were introduced, some close to nationwide and when the emergency was over, life returned to normal.
If you want to know how the kind of Libertarian human rights you espouse works out in practice i recommend this link: www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/21534416/free-state-project-new-hampshire-libertarians-matthew-hongoltz-hetling