Gransnet forums

Legal, pensions and money

UK pensions lowest in developed world!

(118 Posts)
Nonnie Mon 12-Feb-18 15:44:51

Just opened Yahoo and this was on the front page.

UK retirees receive lowest pensions in the developed world
Mark Dorman,Yahoo Finance UK 5 hours ago
Reactions Like Reblog on Tumblr Share Tweet Email

British pensioners are near the bottom of the league table for what they can expect to be paid on retirement (Getty Images)
Pensions in the UK are the least generous in the developed world, new analysis shows.

Workers earning the average £26,500 salary can expect to be paid less than a third of that – about £122.30 a week – on retirement.

That level of 29% is below the likes of Mexico, Poland and Chile and well under the world average of 63%.

MORE: Two out of three UK pension schemes are in the red to the tune of £210bn

The pension rate was assessed by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).

It reports that in contrast to the UK, Holland replaces 100% of a typical worker’s wage when they retire.

Portugal, Italy and Austria pay above 90% of a worker’s salary on retirement, while in France it is 74.5%, Germany 50.5% and the US 49.1%.

The UK is right at the bottom of the scale for pensions (OECD)
Pensions and retirement pots have been a hot political potato for years, with a succession of reports warning millions of people in the UK are set for a tough time in their twilight years.

MORE: 1 in 8 workers thinking of quitting their pension scheme

Few have saved anywhere near enough to supplement their state pension. Young people setting out on their working lives today are also facing the prospect of having to work well into their 70s before they can quit.

From later this year, the state pension age for women will rise from 63 to match men at 65, and will reach 66 for both by 2020.

The government’s economic forecasters, the Actuary’s Department, believes it will become 70 in the 2050s and 71 in the 2060s.

MORE: Millions of British workers are sitting on a six-figure pension lump sum without realising it

Former pensions minister Baroness Altmann said: “Those with no other private pension or savings will face a much bigger drop in spending power than pensioners in all other countries.

“What’s even more shocking is that the Government Actuary says the costs of paying UK state pensions are unaffordable.

“In the past, our low state pensions were supplemented by generous final salary-type pensions from employers, or by an earnings-linked part of the state pension.”

durhamjen Tue 13-Feb-18 19:00:18

Yes, that's been corrected by nonnie, Jalima.

Jalima1108 Tue 13-Feb-18 19:01:18

Oh right, OK

GracesGranMK2 Tue 13-Feb-18 19:46:38

LG (I cannot call you Lazigirl smile) I think you are very right. The 'self-employed', who are the Emperor's new clothes of the employment statistics, will throw up all sorts of issues in the future, pensions being one. The usual Tory short term fame for long term pain.

GracesGranMK2 Tue 13-Feb-18 19:49:07

It does come down to poor choices in many instances but not always. Sometimes it just seems to be sheer bad luck.

Not just sometimes Jalima. It's called "life" and it's why we introduced Universal State Pension among other things.

durhamjen Tue 13-Feb-18 19:53:50

But there were a lot of people who complained when that was brought in, GracesGran.
Strangely, if people were not paid universal state pension, they would have to claim benefits, so the ordinary tax payer would be paying for it anyway. Makes much more sense to raise the pension.
Those who complain about us all getting winter fuel allowance could ask for it to be subsumed in the pension, where those on large pensions could be taxed on it.

gillybob Tue 13-Feb-18 19:58:42

Does anyone really think that those on the lower end of the pay scale, paying full NI, tax and the new (rubbish ) workplace pension will be any better off in the future? For those at the lower end of the pay scale the workplace pension will be a pittance and might even stop them from getting vital benefits, as the pension companies will be happily creaming their profits off first .

gillybob Tue 13-Feb-18 20:00:07

Those who complain about us all getting winter fuel allowance could ask for it to be subsumed in the pension, where those on large pensions could be taxed on it

I agree with that dj

Tegan2 Tue 13-Feb-18 21:06:31

I've been really cold this winter; in fact I've kept my heating on throughout the night [something I never used to do] and walk around with my hot water bottle most evenings. I'm so glad that, when I feel guilty about the amount of gas I'm using I know I've got £200's worth in hand.

Norah Tue 13-Feb-18 21:15:08

From the article: The UK is right at the bottom of the scale for pensions (OECD) Is this a bad thing? What is a good pension amount?

Nothing can be fixed if there is no goal? To have a larger pension scheme taxes would go up, is that what people want? I am fine with the idea of higher taxes. The money has to come from somewhere.

Few have saved anywhere near enough to supplement their state pension. And why is that? Should emphasis be placed on living with no wasteful spending on frivolities and saving more as our parents did?

Young people setting out on their working lives today are also facing the prospect of having to work well into their 70s before they can quit. Is this a bad age? We live longer healthier lives now, don't we?

MissAdventure Tue 13-Feb-18 21:24:34

Don't those who are wealthier live longer, healthier lives? It used to be the case.

gillybob Tue 13-Feb-18 21:38:20

Of course the wealthier tend to live longer. Stress is a big killer .

I have an underlying medical condition that feeds on stress .

Norah Tue 13-Feb-18 21:40:19

Overall life expectancy is considerably higher in the last century. smile

MissAdventure Tue 13-Feb-18 21:42:59

Just as well. I'm hoping to see a least a couple of years of my pension whilst I'm still alive enough to enjoy it.

Eloethan Tue 13-Feb-18 22:12:23

I seem to recall that at one time many employers stipulated that an employee had to work for the organisation for a period of time, often as much as 5 years, before they were eligible to join a company pension scheme. For anyone who changed jobs, either for improvement or by necessity because they had to move, this meant that they may not have had the opportunity to become part of a company pension scheme. I believe the rules were changed to make it much easier for people, including part-timers, to join a company pension schemes.

When my firm was taken over by a much larger firm of solicitors, the pension provider changed. Unfortunately we were moved to Equitable Life which, through bad judgment and decision-making by senior officers, collapsed, significantly reducing the pension of most people in the scheme.

There have also been several cases in which companies have collapsed, leaving under-funded schemes and much reduced pensions for contributors. It hardly encourages people, especially people on low wages who need every penny to pay bills, to put their money into a pension.

gillybob Tue 13-Feb-18 22:16:54

I’m with you missadventure I would really like to see at least a years worth ( dare I say two???) of retirement with my DH before the drop dead . I really don’t see a lot of hope though.

Eloethan Tue 13-Feb-18 22:27:29

Norah Your comment that "we live longer, healthier lives now" is, I think, mistaken.

Whilst it is true that average life expectancy has increased significantly since the 50's/60's, I believe I'm right in saying that various pieces of research have found that we have fewer healthy years.

Norah Tue 13-Feb-18 22:37:59

I thought life expectancy was longer and healthier, I'm sorry if I was wrong. I will look to see what I may find.

How many healthy years past retirement age do we need?

My point was also: what is wanted? UK has lowest pensions, is that bad? What raises in taxes would be good? It will cost something, coming from somewhere to increase pensions.

Norah Tue 13-Feb-18 22:43:36

I think newnanny is spot on when she post : " in many countries the government takes far more in tax but then you get a higher pension. In Sweden I think the income tax is double what we pay in UK.

Our government allows us to keep far more of the money we earn and expects us to to take personal responsibility to pay into a pension. You can't have your cake and eat it too, pay nothing in and then complain you won't get much back.

As it is those who did not make pension provision will be given pension top up but then that money can't be used for NHS or social care, or education, it can only be spent once."

GracesGranMK2 Tue 13-Feb-18 23:02:08

I think it is time we had a huge rise in inheritance tax as we did after WWI. It would do a nice bit of redistributing.

Eloethan Tue 13-Feb-18 23:03:14

The income tax paid in Scandinavian countries is higher than in the UK but I'm pretty sure it's not double.

As a result of higher taxation, Scandinavian and other progressive countries have a much smaller gap between the rich and the poor. Also, people in those countries report a higher degree of happiness and satisfaction with their lives - even those citizens who, because they are high earners, pay the most tax - than people in low taxation countries.

Jalima1108 Tue 13-Feb-18 23:10:20

Income tax is most straightforward and we should also clamp down on tax evaders and in fact on some forms of tax avoidance by the super-rich and on big companies who avoid corporation tax.

I'm not sure about inheritance tax, in general property is paid for from taxed income and there are taxes on purchase etc. If filtered down through the generations, it will help those younger people who are struggling now and unable to buy their own homes.
More of us may need care too, and it will probably need to be funded from the sale of any property we may have.

durhamjen Wed 14-Feb-18 01:10:48

youtu.be/yOd6zgBDe64

Financial secrecy index, and how stopping financial secrecy will help our pensions and the finances of poor countries everywhere.

If my grandson can understand why we need to pay taxes properly, I don't see why CEOs of multinationals can't understand.

durhamjen Wed 14-Feb-18 01:13:47

www.financialsecrecyindex.com/introduction/fsi-2018-results

Just in case you want to look at it all.

Nonnie Wed 14-Feb-18 10:15:13

Graces you said "I am anti thoughtless and rather arrogant remarks" In that case why do you make them about me and others? Can't you see that what you said was really nasty?

There is nothing wrong with being proactive and preparing for our own future, in fact it is a responsible thing to do for the greater good as it means the tax payer is not providing for those who have made sensible provision for themselves. In doing so no one has said that those who couldn't have done anything wrong so why the nastiness? If that is envy then it is a shame. I know there are people who could have made provision and haven't but that doesn't mean that everyone who hasn't is among them.

You said " it sounds as if you have never known, either in your own life or others, the day to day anxiety of not being able to take anything for granted." Please do not make assumptions about me, you have no idea what my life has been like, what I have gone through and how I got through it. I have faced real hardship and I have made wrong decisions but I have come through it without whinging and blaming others. I don't know why you attack like this but it does you no credit.

GracesGranMK2 Wed 14-Feb-18 10:19:19

What was really nasty Nonnie? I will happily apologise if it was nasty rather than the truth.