Would you postulate that this is the longest running thread on Gransnet? Linearly rather than chronologically?
If so ,is it related to the importance of the subject, and how it relates to those on the net? Or the importance to the elderly, in general?
If the latter, are we right to assume that we are representative of the vast populace not represented?
If we make protestations to the effect that we never intended to give the impression that we represented all, and accept that in spite of all that has transpired the efficacy is questionable, no, improbable. Why then have some been so heated?
Whose views ,on here, have more relevance than the views of those who are not computer literate, and have not therefore expressed themselves here ,(where such views would probably be almost surgically dissected for grammatical errors and spelling mistakes).
Empowerment is only the authority to do something. I think we are all entitled to post what, (within legal limits)and how, we think fit.
I may be incorrect (and no doubt someone will, with rapidity, point this out to me) but i've only seen the word superiority used in one post, (and I hastily add, recently,to obviate the need for lengthy backtracking)
On a similar tack, If/ when it comes to a vote are we satisfied that the majority are right? Is everyone entitled to a vote?
