I, from my very comfortable situation - Scottish born & bred, living in Scotland with my close family all nearby, can still understand the dilemma faced by those whose hearts are in England although they live/work in Scotland. If the shoe were on the other foot and for some reason, I and my family were stranded in an England about to become independent I would be torn in two. Being 'British' has meant that wherever your place of birth or whatever your parentage, no matter where you lived within the UK it was still your Country and you could travel the world on a British Passport. This loyalty to Britain has been steadily dwindling since WW2 as evidenced by a recent piece of research which showed that throughout the UK the majority of people labelled themselves as primarily Welsh, Irish, English or Scottish with British coming a poor second and for many not featuring at all. My new SIL, now committed to living the rest of his life in Scotland, mainly because he believes it to be the best place to bring up his DD, tells me that he will always be a Yorkshire man first and foremost. He will be voting YES but his dream is that given time the northern English counties will vote to come and join us
.
Gally It is interesting to hear other points of view. Almost all my friends, and ALL my family are YES voters so I only come across committed Unionists when door stepping or at a Public Meeting or street stall. I keep waiting for a good debate about the issues but am afraid that all they offer are arguments of the 'too wee, too poor, too stupid' to manage our own affairs genre.
Jess I don't 'get' the 'small and vulnerable' scenario. The UK has the 22nd biggest population of all 242 independent countries in the world. If you subtract the 5,000,000+ living in Scotland the rest of UK would only slip down one place in the table, swopping places with Italy. An Indie Scotland would come in at 118th just below Denmark and Finland, more or less equal with Norway and above Ireland, New Zealand, Uruguay, all but one of the former Yugoslavian states, Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia and well above Iceland (position 178, population 325,010). So not really that small in the scheme of things. As to the vulnerable? Questions for Jess - Vulnerable to what? Size does not offer any protection from natural disasters, we do have the hateful trident missiles which are supposed to act as a deterrent but as we have no intention of using them and could only do so with the explicit consent of The USA President (and the whole world knows this) what use are they? and exactly whom are they supposed to be deterring? Who are the enemy? Perhaps there is some rival foreign power, laughing like a chookie as we fall further and further into debt while spending 100s of billions (of USA$ by the way) pretending to be still a world power.
Tegan and Bags if you substitute the phrase 'the right to self-determination' (which is after all what the referendum is about) for the loaded word 'Nationalism'. It has been 269 years since there was last a stand up violent fight among us and even that owed as much to Catholic/Protestant hatred as political or nationalistic issues.
RIVERWALK I have writ that large because I believe yours to be the best question we have had on this thread. I do think that a decent system of PR would have made a huge difference in perceptions of democracy in this country. There are loads of us older voters who for their whole lives might as well have pissed into the wind as vote Tory in a safe Labour seat or vice-versa. With PR every vote would count towards the final result and give everyone a say in how we are governed. Under FTP, smaller and new parties and Independents, unless support is concentrated in one or two constituencies cannot get a toehold, except perhaps at a bi-election where every vote does count. The SNP spent years contesting all Scottish seats and attracting around 30% of the vote but it was spread to thin to win many seats and the Mantra at a general election was always 'Vote Labour to keep the Tories out'. Under the PR system adopted for the Scottish Parliament (and no threat of a Tory Government there) the SNP vote has zoomed up until they now have a clear majority in the Scottish Parliament.
PR for UK elections was an idea doomed from the start by virtue of opposition from the two big parties and the weakness of the Lib Dems in dropping it from their list of demands when their support was needed. The big 2 would much rather have a chance of total power some of the time than some influence all of the time. This is the reality of our so-called democracy - that more voters vote for parties who do not get into power than vote for the 'winners' and thousands, nay millions more do not vote at all because they know it will not affect the outcome.
Eloethan I totally agree with your analysis.