Gransnet forums

News & politics

What would you like to see cut?

(185 Posts)
whitewave Thu 04-Dec-14 10:12:50

Well according to the OBR government spend per person will have to drop from £3000 per person - current spend - to £1300 per person in order to meet the governments plans for the next few years.

Bearing in mind the cuts that have taken place already in order to get it to £3000 what would other GN's like to see cut in order to meet the target of more than 50% more cuts?

Of course you don't have to accept these parameters and could suggest other ways of cutting the debt.

whitewave Thu 04-Dec-14 10:55:07

Since posting this I have been trying to think of something and am finding great difficulty. Thinking back to when this level of spend which was the 30's of course we didn't have the welfare state then, so if we want to protect at the very least the NHS I am stuck! I suppose we could get rid of some government departments such as DEFRA, drastically cut military spending such as Trident. Perhaps do things like cut lighting at midnight for everywhere. Cut art grants.

Teetime Thu 04-Dec-14 10:55:17

-Excessive bureaucracy at all levels.
-MPs pensions and benefits
-Wars
-HS2

for starters

whitewave Thu 04-Dec-14 10:56:37

tee that won't go anywhere near what is necessary

soontobe Thu 04-Dec-14 10:57:52

It might be fairer to have 5 cuts across the board, except in heath, education, health and safety such as fire services etc.
Not sure that defence should have further cuts.

soontobe Thu 04-Dec-14 11:00:45

the 5 was supposed to be %.
So eg 20% cuts or whatever is necessary across all sectors except the ones I listed.

I didnt list things like bureaucracy, as it doesnt happen.

whitewave Thu 04-Dec-14 11:06:38

Education and areas such as police fire etc are not being protected under the next round of cuts, so they would have to be part of your 20% soon

Charleygirl Thu 04-Dec-14 11:07:09

They waste so much money on duff computer systems for one- prudent housekeeping is needed.

Locally here around 23 people are going on a "jolly" to America to find out how A&E works. Nothing but the best- 5 star hotels etc. That nonsense should be cut out. I know it is not billions but the housekeeping has to start at the lowest level first.

whitewave Thu 04-Dec-14 11:10:48

To achieve the level of cuts needed to met the target, we can't talk in terms of duff computer systems, you need to start from the top and then work down.

Of course we haven't yet been told whether the NHS is to be protected, because if that is to be part of the cuts then we will easily achieve our target.

soontobe Thu 04-Dec-14 11:36:56

Is this thread hypothetical? Or our wishes?
Or are you bigchief on this thread? grin

J52 Thu 04-Dec-14 11:40:05

Letters from gov. depts. about things i already know! They have my e mail, so use that!

It is interesting that some things are on the internet, are in the "public domain", so we have to find out for ourselves. Brings to mind the saying, 'if you want to keep a secret, post it on a notice board.'

But other things, such as the winter fuel allowance require a personal letter?

Such a waste. x

Ariadne Thu 04-Dec-14 11:56:34

What do you mean, soontobe? confused

GillT57 Thu 04-Dec-14 11:57:45

I keep swithering between fear of the future and fury at the country being in this mess. To my mind, and I know many will disagree, the rot started with Margaret Thatcher and her policies. She was able to keep everyone happy by selling off lots of the 'family silver' to subsidise spending, and I truly believe that selling off council owned homes without using the receipts to build replacements is the basis of a lot of the problems. We now have the situation when even people on what would once have been considered a fair income are unable to pay their way, pay their rent without some form of tax credit or housing benefit. I am not criticising the people concerned, but think it is a dreadful situation when people are often receiving more in tax credits than they do from their employer. I also am not necessarily criticising the employer. In my own family, when my parents and their siblings got married, they all paid their own way, uncles who were lorry drivers, police constables, were able to not only pay their own rent, but could save up and have a good holiday every year. I dont know what the answer is, but I have a good suspicion on what the cause is. I fear for both my retirement, if it should ever happen, and for the future of my children. They will both be professional graduates and unlikely to be able to be able to rent a decent property let alone own their own.

whitewave Thu 04-Dec-14 12:34:17

soon no I am not big chief but trying to work out how these massive cuts are to be made and nothing that the GN's have suggested so far will any where near get to the goal. We need to think a massive amount not bits and pieces around the edge.

GillT57 Thu 04-Dec-14 12:36:37

As to what I would like to see cut, if cuts are needed:
Scrap Trident
scrap the nonsense HS2 rail line
Public scrutiny ( not MPs, real people in real companies) of spending on IT systems. ( Just how much was wasted on the NHS system?)
Pay or Go system of taxation; either pay your taxes or bugger clear off, this is to be applied to tax dodging companies and individuals. We dont only need to cut spending, we need to increase income. Name and shame them. If they dont pay their way, dont shop in their shops ( Phillip Green of Arcadia group take note), dont buy their music, dont go to their concerts.

soontobe Thu 04-Dec-14 12:46:55

What do I need to google to find some articles about this?

soontobe Thu 04-Dec-14 12:47:40

I cant decided if the HS2 rail line is nonsense or not.

papaoscar Thu 04-Dec-14 12:59:16

Employers should be required to pay a living wage without the state having to top-up pay. Rents should be controlled so as to reduce public support. Squadrons and regiments of useless gold-braided military brass-hats should be put out to grass, together with cohorts of parasitic NHS senior management. This should all provide loads of savings. I would also set up a proper analysis and costing of the nations needs. I would also start the claw back, without compensation, of national assets, infrastructure and utilities. And I haven't started on Westminster or the Monarchy yet. I would be a real Genghis Khan!

Gracesgran Thu 04-Dec-14 13:03:07

I have to agree GillT57 that, IMO, the tide turned when Madame T was in power. The attempt was to make everyone believe they were all middle-class now and therefore had more in common with those who espoused completely free markets rather than the truth, which is that most live on income not capital and tend to get our little bit of savings or capital investment gobbled up by big capitalists, This led many into taking on and then living on, personal debt. (I could talk about her grasping power to the centre too but this is not what we are about in this thread).

Whitewave you seem to have swallowed the conservative propaganda that it is all about cuts. Of course the Conservatives want us to believe this is all about cuts as their aim is and always has been for smaller government and the awful mess brought about by free market capitalists is giving them every opportunity to convince us that this must happen. They will, of course, destroy many people in the process as they care little about the low wage economy they are creating.

Yes, of course we need to make some cuts but we must invest in growing the economy too. Investment in the infrastructure and education are hugely important.

I would, in order to help toward the cuts that are actually necessary cut all tax relief measures. Absolutely all. Everyone should pay their tax.

With the Conservatives saying that only 40% of the "necessary" cuts have been made my brain is unable to think of more. I just want to weep for the poor people who are going to have their lives turned upside-down.

Ana Thu 04-Dec-14 13:12:11

Whose lives are going to be turned upside down, Gracesgran. Will anyone's life be dramatically different after whatever it is you're envisaging happens? confused

gillybob Thu 04-Dec-14 13:13:35

I would like to respond to two posts.

GillT57 I agree with the scrapping of the HS2 project that will predominately serve the South of England (as usual) and will no doubt run into £ billions. I am not convinced that saving a few minutes on a journey will make one iota of difference as to whether a contract is won or lost. I totally agree with the Pay or Go taxation system. How dare the likes of Gary Barlow claim to be charitable when he is guilty of tax avoidence. Hypocrite of the highest order.

papaoscar yes in an ideal world all employers should pay a "living wage" (although not sure how this could be defined) but please bear in mind that once manufacturers are pushed into paying higher wages for the most menial of tasks then three things are inevitable.
1) Manufacturers will leave the uk.
2) Companies will automate all possible processes.
3) The cost of everything we buy will rise steeply to cover the additional costs.

Granny23 Thu 04-Dec-14 13:13:37

Instead of fuddling about with 5% cuts to all the budgets, where any saving made will be cancelled out by the cost of planning and implementing the cuts, there needs to be drastic changes and cancellations of 'vanity' projects. I mean H62, renewal of trident, new motorways etc. I would also abolish the House of Lords, forthwith, or at least suspend it for the duration of the economic crisis.

We live on a very tight budget and there is no excess spending on anything. We have the cheapest deals for fuel, computer, insurance, etc and have cut our food bill to the bone - although it still rises as prices creep up continuously whilst our income is fixed. Today we have had to cancel plans to surface our driveway (needed but not essential) because we are facing a £1,000+ repair bill for the car - which is essential.

The government must bite the bullet and cancel or delay these huge projects. They must become our 'Jam tomorrow' so that we can have our daily bread now.

GillT57 Thu 04-Dec-14 13:21:13

Yes Gracesgran* why must we believe that we are being told the truth about necessary cuts? And why is everyone so calmly accepting of it? To use a simple comparison: in a household we have income and certain outgoings. If there is a negative balance at the end of the month we have two options: reduce outgoings or increase income. Certain economies can be made in such things as food, fuel, clothing, but other expenses are inflexible i.e council tax, water, power, rent/mortgage. in that situation we would look at increasing income by taking on more hours/better paid job/second job. To apply this simple analogy to central government, they have now cut all they can on expenditure, now need to increase income so to my mind they need to start aggressive tax collection from individuals and those who shelter their companies in tax havens. I have said this before and will say it again; I have a small business, employ 8 people part time and I pay more Corporation Tax than The Ritz Hotel. So, sorry Whitewave it is not all about cuts to expenditure it is also about increasing income. Given a spread sheet I bet most of us here could do a better job than those responsible now. angry And Papaoscar I agree wholeheartedly with your comments about the top brass who serve no purpose other than ceremonial. We could pay for 5 or 6 teachers for what each of those pompous old farts gentlemen cost us

gillybob Thu 04-Dec-14 13:37:26

I have said this before and will say it again; I have a small business, employ 8 people part time and I pay more Corporation Tax than The Ritz Hotel

Yes me too GillT57 it makes me sick.

annodomini Thu 04-Dec-14 14:06:00

Trident.