Gransnet forums

News & politics

What would you like to see cut?

(186 Posts)
whitewave Thu 04-Dec-14 10:12:50

Well according to the OBR government spend per person will have to drop from £3000 per person - current spend - to £1300 per person in order to meet the governments plans for the next few years.

Bearing in mind the cuts that have taken place already in order to get it to £3000 what would other GN's like to see cut in order to meet the target of more than 50% more cuts?

Of course you don't have to accept these parameters and could suggest other ways of cutting the debt.

Eloethan Wed 17-Dec-14 01:25:15

Ana You brought up the subject of the IDS spoof tweets in an attempt to ridicule durhamjen. But then, when she responded by saying that David Cameron was taken in by them too, you tell her to "lighten up".

Didn't you fall for it too POGS?

soontobe Wed 17-Dec-14 07:31:27

I will get to the UKIP bit.

And you have told me all I need to know about the Labour bit.
Tut tut. I hope you have apologised to people if you have done that in real life.

Ariadne Wed 17-Dec-14 09:20:24

confused

POGS Wed 17-Dec-14 19:13:43

Eloethan

No.

rosequartz Wed 17-Dec-14 19:37:50

the Labour Party's attempts to re-establish their credibility

Yes, my DF would be shuddering if he knew what had happened to his beloved Labour party over the last 17 years.

I'm sorry, but they have a long way to go.

durhamjen Mon 29-Dec-14 13:56:24

Perhaps here's the start of Labour's rehabilitation.

www.theguardian.com/business/2014/dec/29/labour-government-not-responsible-crash-bank-england-governor-mervyn-king

whitewave Mon 29-Dec-14 14:17:52

I don't think that King's article should come as "news" to anyone. Of course the thinking throughout the past 30 years has been less regulation and smaller government. This started with our illustrious leader the sacred Margaret. Whether the Labour government was correct in following the zeitgeist is another issue.

What is certain though is that Britains deficit and debt was better than most other developed nation's before the crash.

Our position at the last election was as a result of bailing out the banks to the tune of squillions. Whether the British Government should have done so or left the banks out to dry is another argument.

durhamjen Mon 29-Dec-14 14:19:54

What he is saying is that this government should stop blaming Labour as they went along with it, as did the Libdems.

whitewave Mon 29-Dec-14 14:25:59

Yes durham as I mentioned it was the accepted ideology by some for smaller government and less regulation. However, there can always be an argument from the left whether a Labour Government should seemingly blindly follow the argument of such ideology coming as was from the Republicans and Tories.

papaoscar Mon 29-Dec-14 18:07:48

Yes, Meryn King is quite right. The Labour Party, for all its sins, was NOT responsible for the worldwide financial crash resulting from the utter irresponsibility and greed of the banking and finance sectors. Free enterprise and self-regulation were, and still are, key elements of Tory philosophy and to try and shift the blame for the mess onto the shoulders of others is a typical shabby trick on the part of this devious little rich-boy government. Remember that come the election.