Gransnet forums

News & politics

A new recruit for the relationship thread ??

(38 Posts)
absentgrandma Sun 08-Mar-15 16:19:51

I read (in the DM, so could be a load of rubbish!!) that a certain High Person as been bemoaning the fact that he has been cut out of his grandson's life. DIL's mum is reported ( by High Person's friends) to have taken over 3rd -in -line- to- the- throne to the exclusion of Grandpa's esteemed family.

Now I read MIL is moving in to replace the housekeeper! OMG !!

jinglbellsfrocks Sun 08-Mar-15 18:24:07

That's very true Mishap.

Mishap Sun 08-Mar-15 18:26:35

I think it is a temporary move till new staff are found and the new babe is born. I imagine there is a fair amount of space so they will not be treading on each other's toes.

loopylou Sun 08-Mar-15 18:33:09

William probably has had more of a 'family life' since he met Kate than since he was born, so good on him, IMO.
He hopefully wants to ensure he has children who are well-adjusted and 'normal', rather than being brought up in an environment totally removed from reality.

Deedaa Sun 08-Mar-15 20:24:13

If Kate didn't spend much time with her mother the DM would be the first to proclaim that she had become to grand for her own family and had dropped them completely.

Charles should really join Gransnet and get some advice from others who feel they're missing out.

GrannyTwice Sun 08-Mar-15 20:56:31

Well I think it's chickens coming home to roost - when you think how previously anyone marrying into the royal family had to give up their own families - especially at Christmas , it's great to see the boot on the other foot. The queen never seemed to care about sharing Christmas out which the rest of us grapple with so about time there was a rebalancing

janerowena Sun 08-Mar-15 21:30:47

But it's in the Daily Fail! Of course it's not true!

granjo39 Sun 08-Mar-15 22:16:12

Why did the original housekeeper and gardener leave? Perhaps a little push? wink

merlotgran Sun 08-Mar-15 22:20:59

They live on the estate so they've gone back to the Big House.

They were probably only on loan.

I wonder how long the nanny will last?

gillybob Sun 08-Mar-15 22:40:22

Completely weird. All of them.

grannyactivist Sun 08-Mar-15 22:45:23

If any of this 'reporting' is at all accurate, which I find doubtful in the extreme, I have a couple of questions:
Who are these 'friends' who are quoted extensively I wonder?
And how much money changed hands to get them to betray confidences?

absent Sun 08-Mar-15 23:03:00

This news was all over so-called news websites last week none of which identified the source(s) and all of which felt obliged to point out that the Cambridges did not attend the Royal Family's traditional Christmas dinner last year. It was just about as interesting as the article dedicated to the appearance of a fews grey hairs on the Duchess's head.

rosequartz Sun 08-Mar-15 23:14:38

'Friends' can be primed to drop a word or two in the ear of a sympathetic journalist.

If one had 100 rooms one could accommodate one's in-laws without them being constantly under one's feet.

People in an average 3 bed semi might find it a little too cosy for comfort.