Gransnet forums

News & politics

Article 50

(860 Posts)
Mair Thu 26-Jan-17 14:36:09

Well its been announced that Jeremy Corbyn is applying a three line whip to his MPs to make them support the triggering of article 50.

I admire Jeremy for this, it's an act of leadership, and it could save Labours bacon in the many Northern Brexit seats that they hold, so in that sense I am not entirely pleased because it will weaken UKIPs chances. It will also weaken Paul Nuttalls chances in Stoke.

What do the Bremain Labour supporters on GN feel about this?

Yorkshiregel Sat 04-Feb-17 13:41:18

Yes, I do know that durhamjen but last time I looked Yorkshire and Durham were in the UK! We all pay money to London but at least we know we are supporting OUR OWN country and not half of Europe.

There are poor people in our own country. Imo we should be supporting them, education, the NHS, road maintenance and green belt areas not sending vast sums of money overseas to countries who do not need and do not want our money.

I cannot wait for Article50 to be triggered and then all the moaning can stop.

Yorkshiregel Sat 04-Feb-17 13:35:23

durhamjen I was not intending to offend anyone. There are those who know how it works and those who do not.

rosesarered Sat 04-Feb-17 13:28:22

In any case, there have been enough 'divisions' surely?

rosesarered Sat 04-Feb-17 13:27:11

I can't see Parliament agreeing on 'the city state' for London.

rosesarered Sat 04-Feb-17 13:24:55

GGM2 who will want to to join up with Scotland?! Not that the Scots would want it either,grin
and in England there has always been a North /South divide.The journalists always choose somebody who is likely to say'we wanted to give them a bloody nose' and there will always be a few prepared to say that, but that certainly doesn't mean that all in the North think that way.We are only shown ( on tv) the few replies that are the most sensational, and never see the replies that are edited out.Same when a journalist writes an article.There are many reasons why people in those areas voted out.

durhamjen Sat 04-Feb-17 13:22:28

Yes, I agree. London should be its own city state and not take money from everywhere else in the UK.

GracesGranMK2 Sat 04-Feb-17 13:12:13

It's not surprising London "is big enough and wealthy enough to be a city state" when it gets twice as much investment per head of population suzied.

JessM Sat 04-Feb-17 13:08:15

Sad really, because people in the areas which were benefiting most from EU structural funding have given themselves a bloody nose. The are going to lose the additional funding and as always, get hit harder post Brexit when the economy inevitably will suffer. sad

Mair Sat 04-Feb-17 13:00:54

Yorkshiregel

Thank you very much for your informative posts, I was not previously aware of the scale of the cover up by our own Pro EU politicians.

Mair Sat 04-Feb-17 12:54:45

I think London should be independent of the Uk. Most of the wealth of the UK is generated in London. It is big enough and wealthy enough to be a city state. This makes perfect sense if we follow the Brexit argument

And why do you think the rest of us should be willing to surrender our capital city?
London belongs to all of us not just those who happen to live there, many relative newcomers.

Its an absolutely bonkers idea, and simply a backdoor method of destroying borders.

Firecracker123 Sat 04-Feb-17 12:49:30

Yorkshiregel well said totally agree with you.
Nigglynellie it doesn't suit their agenda to criticize any of the EU countries.

suzied Sat 04-Feb-17 12:28:08

I think London should be independent of the Uk. Most of the wealth of the UK is generated in London. It is big enough and wealthy enough to be a city state. This makes perfect sense if we follow the Brexit argument.

durhamjen Sat 04-Feb-17 11:26:23

I wonder if yougov have done one, GracesGran.

GracesGranMK2 Sat 04-Feb-17 11:09:19

After listening to how much less the north gets than the south in investment I think we are even more likely to ask to leave the UK and join up with an independent Scotland. In an article in the New Statesman a journalist doing some in depth interviewing reported that many of the people in the north who he had spoken to said that one of the reasons they voted to 'leave' was to give London a bloody nose. It would be interesting to see a proper survey done to find out what were the most important reasons for how those, both in and out voted.

durhamjen Sat 04-Feb-17 11:06:12

'And of course what lies ahead is important, but it's also important to point out why Brexiters voted as they did.'

That's why I asked, niggly.

durhamjen Sat 04-Feb-17 11:03:59

When the United States started off, there were only 13 of them. Now there are 50.
The government collects taxes from each state and only sends back what it wants, not all of it.
Trump is now deciding on a case by case basis whether to give federal money to states that say anything against him. At least there are rules in the EU about what can be paid for; it's not on the whim of one man who thinks the union is his own business.

nigglynellie Sat 04-Feb-17 11:02:42

Yorkshiregel, you couldn't have put it better! These are exactly the reasons I voted to leave. Perhaps others will now stop constantly asking why people voted Brexit! You have been told, clearly and concisely!!
It's odd that nobody condemns the Hungarian Prime Minister for his refugee policy - razor wire fences are hardly humane!! Other countries too have pretty unpleasant policies, Austria introducing a dress code, France already has one! Where the hell are these marchers?!!!!

durhamjen Sat 04-Feb-17 11:00:41

Sorry, Yorshiregel, do you take us for idiots? Of course we know that. Some of us don't see anything wrong with it.

Do you also know that when Yorkshire and Durham collect taxes, they are sent to the government and they only give us a percentage back? So we are spending our own money. The rest of it is spent in London and the South East.
Just thought I'd remind you in case you had forgotten.

rosesarered Sat 04-Feb-17 10:27:22

Yes Yorkshire another good reason for leaving the EU.smile

Yorkshiregel Sat 04-Feb-17 08:37:06

I am not sure if people know this so I will mention it here anyway. Did you know that when you apply for 'EU money' you have to be able to match the amount from sources of your own. ie if you apply for £1 million from the EU to build a new building or to fund 'X' for a year you have to raise the same amount that you ask for yourself. Otherwise you will not be given the money.

When UK sends money to the EU, in our contributions, the EU will send a % of it back. They will also tell UK what it is allowed to spend that money on. They cannot use it for something else. The other % is used by the EU for any projects they like. So when the benevolent EU give us money they are giving us back (only some of) the money that we have paid in. So it means we are spending OUR OWN money.

When The Common Market was launched it had 6 members. Now it has 28! So our contributions have gone up and up.

ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/policy/from-6-to-28-members_en

GracesGranMK2 Sat 04-Feb-17 08:29:31

Ah ... so this is where the 'let's re-run the referendum' thread went grin

Yorkshiregel Sat 04-Feb-17 08:24:28

Imo the government of the day did know what they were doing but because they were desperate to join they turned a blind eye. It was a Conservative government that took us in and now it is a Conservative government that has taken us out. I do not include Cameron in that because he was imo the biggest conman of all. I think they want it all to go away so there will be no enquiry, it will all be shoved in a dark archive somewhere and forgotten about.

I voted Leave because I knew the British people were being conned again. I felt it was my duty because I knew and I did not want to be complicit in what Mr Heath and co did to get us in and what Mr Brown did behind closed doors. I also wanted my children and grandchildren, and yes their children too if they ever materialise to be FREE of the EU yoke and I wanted them to live in a modern forward thinking Britain, not one that was locked away in the dark ages or even wiped off the map altogether and made to jump in to the big glob of sameness that the EU want us all to become.

durhamjen Fri 03-Feb-17 23:30:19

Why did Brexiters vote as they did?

Ana Fri 03-Feb-17 21:19:27

Yes, that's a point Elegran. It could take years to work out...grin

Elegran Fri 03-Feb-17 21:07:30

We would have to return all EU grants and subsidies. The sums would be interesting - the totals might even prove something or other.