The difference, to me, is using a large sum (from VAT) to subsidise a program that has not been fully determined. Better, to me, is to source and implement the new food program from school funding from whatever taxes, including VAT. Not spend to but spend from. Seems squiggy, to me, to spend to a sum. DH says squiggy, to mean possibility to tend crooked. 
How can *anybody* still see this man as any kind of statesman or world leader?
why do Wetherspoons employ these idiots?
