I wish to correct an outstanding misconception that some people have: I do not dislike Corbyn, nor do I recall ever having said that I did. Criticising some of his (or his supporters') policy ideas is not criticism of him.
That is the kind of misinterpretation that provoked me into sharper replies than perhaps I should have given to some posts. Not that I think the posts of some others to/about me are not equally sharp.
"muck raking" is a figure of speech that is not a comment on the character of the person who has raked up and displayed the information in question. It was appropriate where I used it because all that was said about JRM was negative. I'm not saying there that there is anything positive to say about him, just that there wasn't any displayed in the post(s) in question.
Actually, I like how he talks. It is clear and articulate, which is nice to hear when there is so much sloppy speech around.
I have taken on board some of the criticisms of my posts and will try, again, not to get riled by the snipiness directed at me. I think I had kept my cool until the servant comment.
eloethan, I do try to be courteous and I usually succeed. I was not being discourteous by not replying as soon as you expected to your query about the duck film. I just hadn't thought of how to answer because posting it was about a feeling I had rather than something I had verbalised.
And, yes, if people keep on saying negative things about me and keep saying things that are not true about me, and keep implying that I'm not telling the truth, I will eventually get angry and express my anger, which is why I expressed what I felt like saying after the onslaught of things like "you dislike Corbyn", "you don't have the courtesy to", "what did your last servant die of", "look it up yourself", etc.
Finally, nobody has to like every single thing about a political party to be its supporter. This should be obvious, I feel, when there is so much difference of opinion across both the UK's largest parties.